the volunteer state

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006

ford_01.jpgHe’s a bible-thumping, anti-gay marriage, privileged son of the south. He’s Harold Ford Jr, and he’s the key to the midterm elections and a barometer in many ways for the future of the country.

He wants to change course in Iraq, proposing to divide the country, former-Yugoslavia-style, into three roughly independent cantons or states. He attacks Republican positions on homeland security and immigration, but is cozy with Fox News reporters and calls the President a friend. He’s not easy to pigeonhole and he won’t be easily tarred with the liberal brand.

He’s running neck and neck with Republican candidate Bob Corker. Ford is black and Corker is white. The Tennessee voting population is roughly 16 percent black and there have there been no (zero) black senators from the south since Reconstruction. Newsweek estimates Ford needs to win 40 percent of white voters overall in order to prevail on election day.

“He needs white independents and even some white Republicans to win,” says Merle Black, a professor of political science at Emory University. While Ford is ahead by small margins in some polls, recent history (including races in Virginia in 1989 and North Carolina in 1990) suggests that white Southerners will sometimes say they’re willing to vote for a black man in a poll but act differently in the privacy of the voting booth.”

The Republican Party fully aware has aired attack ads that among other things play on fear of black-white sex, as in miscegenation, as in the mixing of the races! Below is the now-infamous ad that features a mock playboy party girl in thrall to the bachelor Congressman.

This video was embedded using the YouTuber plugin by Roy Tanck. Adobe Flash Player is required to view the video.

Maybe we’ve reached a turning point in all of this. What’s it gonna be Tennesee?

web 2.0, reprise

Tuesday, October 24th, 2006

web20buzz.pngA few days ago I blogged about how “NBC 2.0” restructuring plans were merely faux 2.0. Well it seems everyone is talking about 2.0 these day: what it is, what it is not, and whether it is becoming the platform for the short-term future of greedy people.

Legal scholar, creative commons founder, and all-around free internet superhero Larry Lessig wrote a post recently about the distinction between real 2.0 and fake 2.0 sites, arguing that YouTube is among the latter. He explains:

“YouTube gives users very cool code to either “embed” content on other sites, or to effectively send links of content to other sites. But never does the system give users an easy way to actually get the content someone else has uploaded. Of course, many have begun building hacks to suck content off of the YouTube site. (On the Mac, I’ve used TubeSock to do that). But this functionality — critical to true sharing — is not built into the YouTube system.”

This post drew the ire of Nick Carr, who accuses Lessig of– what else?– promoting communist values.

So why does any of this matter, really, in the world beyond academics and tech geeks? Essentially because something good—media tools and practices that enable true exchange and collaboration– are being co-opted by those who want to maintain the status quo.

If we fight to maintain the possibility of Web 2.0 by supporting net neutrality, copyright reform, and by attempting to distinguish between the fake end the real, we’ll encourage more great progressive interactive tools, the kind Lessig deems 2.0, such as flickr and Blip TV and more DIY projects like open source gaming and software and citizen journalism.

While the verdict is still out on whether people participating in making media are more likely to be active citizens, efforts such as Sunlight’s Under the Influence project, which enables web users to investigate how many members of the House of Representatives have their spouses on the campaign payroll, seem to have significant political value.

So don’t believe the hype! Web 2.0 is not about making money, it’s about sharing culture.

Boo!

Monday, October 23rd, 2006

guards.jpgSalon’s video blog offers a gem today: a Republican National Committee ad that ran on CNN this weekend, featuring no candidate positions, no policy info, no attack on rival candidates, nothing but grainy footage of Osama and other men in Arab garb doing “scary” things that look like maybe combat training or parody martial arts moves. Quotes run across the screen in barely legible font about “killing Americans” etc. This is supposed to be just a general message from the Republicans as a party to the voters. Nice. Full of actionable information. Thanks.

Salon editor Kerry Lauerman suggests that maybe the RNC is taking writing cues from the Lamont campaign in Connecticut, which has been caricaturing exactly this sort of Republican (read: Lieberman) shite. Watch the ad and then– boo, scary– go vote Republican. Or sign up to fight in Iraq for freedom or whatever the thing is supposed to be making you feel like doing beside pissing your pants laughing or turning it the fu– off! (Yeah we’re cynical, thanks to stuff like this!)

Deportation Blues

Sunday, October 22nd, 2006

By Davey D

slickrick.gifThe War on Terror is on all right. It’s all up on hip-hop! Crunk mega star M.I.A. still can’t get into the U.S.A.

Now Hip-hop artist Slick Rick the Ruler is the target of a campaign hatched by the INS and Homeland Security to deport him. The laws being applied in the case are retroactive.

In other words: sixteen years ago, Rick served three years in jail and has been clean as a whistle ever since, yet the governement is applying immigration laws only recently passed to revisit his case, and he is now threatened with deportation to the UK, where he hasn’t lived in since he was 11 years old. He breaks down the sordid details in the audio interview below.

Also joining us are Rick’s attorney, Alex, out of Miami and veteran publicist Bill Adler. They give us the full rundown of this very strange and twisted affair and the long-term implications it may pose not only for Rick but for immigrants across the States. You won’t believe your ears.


powered by ODEO

——
This piece appeared originally at Davey D’s hip hop corner.

Happy “Dress-Like-A-Ho” Day!

Saturday, October 21st, 2006

There wasn’t a parental warning on the site. I didn’t have to fork over my credit card number or proof of age. And yet I’m freely paging through images of hundreds of pouty women clad in the most outlandish of role-playing fetish gear. There oughta be a law … against the superskanky women’s costumes at SpiritHalloween.com!

From sexy witch to saucy maid, from skanky mail carrier to slutty scarecrow, the Halloween-costume wardrobe for women is now entirely built on a base of thigh-high fishnets and push-up bras.

Oh hells no I’m not wearing that
19cost2190.jpg

Even the New York Times is ready to hang up the G-string vampire costume this Oct. 31 (you may have to log in, and for this I am sorry)

New York Times: Good Girls Go Bad, For A Day
New York Times: Halloween On Heels

I’m hoping this skeezy trend is a sex-positive feminist “Take Back The Dominatrix Outfits!” holler, but it’s hard to keep up that optimism while vainly searching for a costume that wouldn’t make my parents cry.

“I think it’s damaging because it’s not just one night a year . … If it’s all the costume manufacturers make, I think it says something bigger about the culture as a whole.” Tanda Word, Texas Tech student, likes being warmly dressed on Pumpkin Day

It’s worse when tacky oversexualization, aka Skankula, starts preying on the kids’ costumes:

I wear more than this to the beach
00151134detaila.jpg