Open source TV

Thursday, February 28th, 2008

dnvrom.png

While sites like YouTube are making history by catering to the mass craving to create and distribute amateur video, regular old television— a decade into the internet era— is still pretending the web is basically a form of Sunday newspaper: mostly good for advertising and reprinting schedules. Sorry but American Idol voting is the very definition of faux participation.

Denver Open Media, however, has a bold vision of the future of TV. Every aspect of its public access television station is participatory. The organization lends out equipment and offers low-cost classes on making and uploading video. Open Media members make all the station’s programs. Shows that garner the most votes from viewers are rewarded with the best broadcast time slots. Viewers can also text-in ratings and comments, which appear onscreen in realtime.

DOM is sharing this model with other public-access stations throughout the country. In a video outlining their vision of networked TV, Executive Director Tony Shawcross explains:

In developing all the tools we need on the limited resources that we have, we’ve been working with some of the leading public access stations in the country. Together we’ve invested over $100,000 in developing a tool set that will allow any public access station to adopt the pieces that they want, include them in their model, and start collaborating with us and the other stations so we can together start acting like a network instead of tiny independent isolated stations.

You can watch DOM programs live or browse the archives. Don’t forget to vote!

Requiem for a radical past

Thursday, February 28th, 2008

hirjikubota.jpgIn 1997 I wrote an essay entitled “Is the Web too Cool for Blacks?” In it, I suggested that blacks were not flocking to the then-nascent Web because its chaotic, unconventional mechanisms ran counter to the very conservative impulses that run deep in the Afro-American psyche. “Yes,” I wrote, “black folks brought you jazz. Yes, we are famed in the popular mind for adapting forms of music, speech and worship to suit our own ends, the rules be damned. And we have historically been demonized in the majority mind for congenital lawlessness. Yet, in fact, we are the product of a culture that is among the most conventional and, yes, even timid in modern America.”

Asked to take another look at that piece, I see that blacks have largely bridged the famed digital divide. We still lag somewhat in high-speed access, but that gap, too, is closing. This, however, is less a testament to our rousing ourselves from a shattering complacency than a sign of the deep mainstreaming of the Web, which is now an engine of the status quo. Yes, some insurgents snuck through the door when it was still wide open, but by and large, the big players online are the most familiar ones: TimeWarner, Microsoft (failing for now to gobble Yahoo), CNN, News Corp, Viacom (which ate BET) etc. Back in ‘97, it seemed the Web might be anybody’s playground, but like one of those retro games in which you tilt the little balls into the clown’s eyes, the universes of power and information have come to rest in their standard orbits. Oh well…

If anything, our propensity toward the conventional, our post civil-rights-era allergy toward the radical has only grown in the past decade. But this has put us right in sync with our white countrymen. Oprah Winfrey ascended to the power stratosphere by becoming the doyenne— the veritable high-priestess— of the conventional. From books to music to movies, with rare exception, she reliably identifies that which will comfort and soothe the broadest swath of her audience. Barack Obama is praised for proving how mainstream he is. Our most outré forms, like gangsta rap, are immediately, and with our enthusiastic support, scooped up, sanitized and mainstreamed for consumption in commercials, movies, and fashion.

Our radical history has been sanded and whitewashed into a perversion of its original self, our struggles reduced to picaresque “black history month” bromides that omit the fact that Martin King and his movement radically attacked every edifice of the status quo this country had to offer, from its governance to its military industrial complex, the man himself reduced to some sort of high-end Uncle Remus who just loved him some white folks. You wouldn’t know that the Harlem Renaissance was a hotbed of atheists (Hubert Henry Harrison, A. Philip Randolph), gays (Langston Hughes, Billie Strayhorn, Claude McKay), lesbians (Zora Neale Hurston, Alice Dunbar-Nelson, Angelina Grimké) and communists (WEB DuBois, Chandler Owen). Our most storied achievements were liberally seasoned in radical unconventionality, yet today we stand as the epitome of the mainstream.

Social critics like Bill Cosby and Juan Williams ache for the good ole days when blacks were raised in two-parent homes under the “high moral standing of civil rights.” What they never acknowledge is that those halcyon days of black responsibility were buttressed by a deep radical strain. In Bill Cosby and Alvin Poussaint’s Come On People, they write “Despite the fact that racial discrimination has not been eliminated, black strength lies in our resolve to keep on keeping on, never quitting, never giving up, never yielding to the role of cooperative victim.”

Perhaps that dying strain of radicalism kept us from playing Cosby’s “cooperative victim” by forcing us to relentlessly challenge the status quo—and it vision of us. Perhaps the wholesale acceptance of the status quo is particularly detrimental to an historically reviled minority. Perhaps becoming cooperative victims of a consumerist society while, at the majority’s behest, forgetting the radical strain in our greatest accomplishments… perhaps it has left us particularly vulnerable to society’s ills.

At one time our radical traditions propelled us toward greater progress. Today, we honor our roles as keepers of the status quo. Our music has rarely been less interesting, our letters are leaden, and our religiosity clings to the moldering lace of civil-rights-era words and actions.

It looks like late entry onto the Web was the least of the issues stemming from Afro-America’s loving embrace of the status quo and from our willful blindness to our radical past.

——
Leonce Gaiter’s work on social and cultural issues has appeared in numerous publications, from the Los Angeles Times to the New York Times magazine. His noir novel “Bourbon Street” was published by Carroll & Graf. Image: Hirji Kubota, 1969, Chicago.

What happened to Buddy?

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

smits.jpg

I didn’t know there was any West Wing beyond the seasons featuring Latin-spewing over-the-top Martin Sheen as President Bartlet. Apparently there was and it included a President Obama, or anyway a TV equivalent played by Jimmy Smits. If this is all true, and I think maybe it is, then there was never a need for this year’s grueling Democratic primary campaign. If in fact Obama won over the TV people long ago well then, duh, of course he will win over the American people. Isn’t it the same thing? Elsewhere life may imitate art but, in America, life always imitates entertainment!

While Hillary goes on grousing in debates and on the stump about media bias, sadly referencing Saturday Night Live skits to make her point, etc, her opponent, turns out, was the inspiration of an enormously popular TV show about the presidency long before he ever announced he was running for national office. That’s not media bias. That’s nuclear destruction! Surrender Hillary! They’ll get you and your little dog, too!

Note: Slate disconnected its video player at our site, opting out of free advertising. (So why then include the embed code on the player?) Click on the photo to watch the video over on their well-paved side of the web.

Of bakeries, bribes and bees

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

ybmbakery.jpg

On Oscar night, while most of the country was doing its own Hot Or Not review of the Hollywood red carpet people, a staple of Sunday evening entertainment, 60 Minutes, came out with one of its hardest-hitting episodes of the year.

Scott Pelley’s look at the ludicrously suspect indictment, trial and conviction of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman on bribery charges makes it plain that the case is another of the million reflections we see in the low-brow highly partisan carnival mirror that is Karl Rove’s Bush Administration. Perjured witnesses, confessions of investigative misconduct, refusal to testify at Congressional hearings… Any of that sound familiar?

Sometimes the streets of Oakland can be as treacherous for journalists as those of Baghdad, explains Anderson Cooper in a report on the death of newspaper editor Chauncey Bailey. The murder remains a compelling mystery and the related organized crime orchestrated through a place called Your Black Muslim Bakery points to a strange and uniquely American cultural product, something like The Godfather meets The Nation of Islam. The segment is a fitting tribute to those writers and photographers willing to put their careers and lives on the line to bring us the story.

The show finished with a revision of Steve Kroft’s cautionary tale of the world’s missing honey bees. Seems little has changed since last we heard about these AWOL insects. Scientists remain uncertain whether the losses are due to pesticides, disease, malnutrition or… something else. Hives continue to empty out and Congress has been slow to pledge additional research or beekeeper assistance. One thing we do know: if this trend continues, it will not only mean major trouble for the beekeepers, but also for the wider agricultural industry, reducing fresh produce and impacting consumer prices everywhere. What are they serving these days in the Capitol Hill cafeteria? Recession gumbo?

Finally, the burning journalistic question 60 Minutes failed to answer this Sunday as it has failed to answer every Sunday for the last hundred years: How is it that Andy Rooney is still on television?

Obama v Clinton in OH; don’t believe the headlines

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008

obamahillary.jpg

If you missed Tuesday’s Democratic debate in Ohio and then looked at a collection of headlines, you would think it had been an all out catfight between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. (Excuse the expression— I don’t want to be accused of sexism, maybe I should call it a decidedly manly term like a “battle” or a “war.”)

The Huffington Post screams at the top of its homepage: “Gloves Off…Fists Up.” MSNBC: “Political Slugfest in Ohio.” New York Times: “Democrats Clash on Health, Trade and Rival Tactics.”

I am sorry, but wasn’t this a debate? These are two competent, brilliant, opportunistic individuals sparring off on national television for the role of most powerful person in the world. Political analysts and Bill Clinton himself have suggested that if Clinton does not win in the upcoming Texas and Ohio primaries on March 4, her campaign is dead. She needs this debate and the next primaries to stay alive. As for Obama, if he performs well he could sweep up Ohio and Texas and become the first African-American nominee of a major party.

Shouldn’t they be using everything they got?

Reading the headlines, you would think they were tearing into each other. They weren’t. Okay, they bickered for almost 20 minutes on health care (As if we really needed another debate on health care. Not to be rude, but if you don’t know the difference between Obama and Clinton plans by now, go look it up. ) But even when they discussed health care or the war in Iraq, their argument was more civilized than most spouses or even friends who sit around arguing politics.

(more…)