
News just broke that the California Supreme Court has overturned the ban on gay marriage that they initially enforced in 2004 after San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom gave the green light, opening a month-long window when thousands of gay couples traveled to the Bay Area to get hitched.
The Supreme Court basically said that Newsom couldn’t take matters into his own hands, and neither could they until the lower courts acted first. Fast-forward to 2008, and the Supreme Court finally declares “that domestic partnerships are not a good enough substitute for marriage in an opinion written by Chief Justice Ron George,” according to the New York Times.
The LA Times offers a more in-depth analysis of the decision, essentially saying that this is hardly the end of the road, even in California.
The state high court’s ruling was unlikely to end the debate over gay matrimony in California. A group has circulated petitions for a November ballot initiative that would amend the state Constitution to block same-sex marriage, and the Legislature has twice passed bills to authorize gay marriage. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed both.
I find the hypocrisy and lack of foresight in the US deplorable. As we look back, 40 years removed from the height of the Civil Rights Movement, the contradiction inherent to the phrase “all men are created equal,” as written by slave-owners, is now widely accepted among all but the staunchest of rascists.
Yet most are incapable of drawing the parallel here. In the infinitely-wise words of Chris Rock, “gay people deserve to be just as miserable as the rest of us.”
For the record, I love marriage and I love my wife. And although the dynamic does shift between a couple after marriage, the bulk of the significance is legal. Provided you worked well before taking the plunge.
Still, some people in this country continue to cling to some anachronistic credo of Christianity calling the shots in people’s lives when it comes to who they can and can’t marry. Make no mistake, the easiest way to maintain national homophobia without ascribing to it is shifting the blame to God. Bush all but donned a white collar each time he spoke publicly in support of the ban on gay marriage.
It’s a disregard for the separation of church and state. It’s institutionally sanctioned discrimination. And why the hell does anyone care if two guys want to file a joint tax return?
Ahh, but what about the poor children of these people? Don’t the kids deserve to have a “normal” life? Should they be subjected to a life of unrest if they never have a choice in the matter? Innocent souls! Nevermind the stellar track record of heterosexual households in promoting unity, honoring holy matrimony, and raising children properly.
Funny also that one defense of keeping children out of same-sex parenting households has to do with shielding them from discrimination fostered by the same people enforcing the laws. With some US Supreme Court spots up for grabs and this case likely to be on their slate post-November, this may become the most decisive issue separating an Obama from a McCain administration.
As my good friend (and LA county public defender) Dan put it, the idea of creating a Constitutional amendment that restricts civil liberties is beyond comprehension. Whatever precedent is set once this case is laid to rest may be the last barrier to such an amendment seeing the floor in Congress.
Either way, institutional hatred only lasts so long. This has been proven since the dawn of civilization. Gay people aren’t going anywhere because we try to write them out of existence, looking on their lives as substandard and undeserving. Just as those who deny that we will be a bilingual nation in 30 years are laughable, so too is the idea that gay people will not continue to fight for the equal rights they deserve.
Just as Americans fought to free themselves from British tyranny. Just as women fought for suffrage and equal rights in the workplace. Just as African-Americans fought social injustices now considered archaic. Just as the Berlin Wall fell.
Segregation, marginalization, legislative brow-beating…all prove powerless in the face of the indomitable will of a people to gain equal footing in a society. Why should this be any different? Why are we doomed to repeat our embarrassing cycles of discrimination over and over again only to see the same result once education across generations destroys homegrown ignorance?
Remove the sarcasm from Chris Rock’s statement, and you get something that vaguely resembles one of the documents our country was founded on: “Gay people deserve the right to be just as happy as the rest of us.”
Sounds like a pursuit to me. How about we help them on their way for once?

Cheap Thrills: Obama’s Texting Blitz From an Ad Girl’s Perspective
Bush Plays Beach Volleyball While the Post-American World Burns. Max Zimbert takes him to task.
Obama’s Looking to be the ‘Text’ President. Torey Van Oot dissects the strategy.
Plagiarism: Does the Medium Define the Word? Chris Nelson poses the question to some people with answers.
P+P @ the DNC! Help finance our coverage of the event - check here for how to donate!
Britney, Russell Brand, and the elephant in the room.
Shazia Haq: The Boredom’s Are Anything But Boring
From Shaft to Chef, we bid adieu to Isaac Hayes, cool before cool was cool.
Tricia Romano muses on her time spent watching the late Bernie Mac, and how he got her through a self-imposed social exile.
Geek Love: I am an GTD Geek, Hear Me Roar.





May 15th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Here is another social issue where the US lags far behind Canada and Europe in terms of progress and human rights. Just another example of intollerance centered around fear and ignorance. Let’s focus on the positive momentum of this decision - visit Equality California to see how you can help: http://www.eqca.org/site/pp.as.....;b=4026385
May 16th, 2008 at 1:02 am
I agree. There is so much positive here to celebrate. I hate that my initial impulse is to be cynical, but I hope that this is truly the landmark decision that many are calling it.
May 16th, 2008 at 9:00 am
Marriage is tricky because it is both a legal and a religious institution, and when you start messing with people’s religion all hell breaks lose.
May 16th, 2008 at 10:20 am
I’ve always wondered how devout Christians who also happen to be homosexual reconcile hearing their religion constantly invoked in discriminating against them. It’s a strange dynamic. I completely respect people who practice the religion as a faith, but I just can’t agree with strict interpretations with so many messages of tolerance and forgiveness yet the inability to accept gay people based on what appears to be semantics to an outsider.
May 16th, 2008 at 11:23 am
You wonder how Christians deal with the contradictions?! The Bible has so many contradictions, why should one more matter. Humans seem to be remarkably good at compartmentalizing different kinds of thought (or non-thought) allowing some of the brightest people, some with scientific backgrounds, to believe the most absurd things usually because they were raised that way.
BTW, I believe that all three major religions, not just Christians, have homophobic teachings. You do NOT want to be openly gay in a Muslim society!
May 16th, 2008 at 11:52 am
Yeah, it’s difficult water to tread because like you said, people have very strong emotional, spiritual, and intellectual ties to their religious beliefs and I don’t want to come off as disrespectful of a person’s right to believe in what they choose.
It definitely seems, however, like the three major monotheistic religions are the source of much of the world’s conflict. Amazing that such extreme passion for the teachings of peaceful prophets translates into violence. I just don’t get it. It may just be that religion is an easy demarcation when you have Muslims and Jews trying to squeeze into one tiny piece of land.