The Hillary ask: whatever you do, don’t say “Obama”!

Monday, June 30th, 2008

Campaign letters are always at least a little comic — the faux-personal tone, the formal-informal style, the beggarliness. There are also the “artful” decisions made by the authors that are fun to explore for hidden meanings.

A recent Hillary dispatch to her supporters is a gem. Her campaign is over, the thrill of future campaign-related possibilities long past, and yet she is forced to continue asking for cash. The word “help” is plastered all over the thing, the smell of bad management rising from the text. One particularly pained passage makes the campaign seem like a shamefaced mutt who has left an unwanted deposit on the kitchen floor for the family to clean up.

“There’s something else — less endearing and I hope less enduring — that our campaign has left behind: our substantial campaign debt.”

Yuck.

There is also the decision to leave off entirely the name of the man Hillary is going to be campaigning for beginning Friday, the man now at the center of the “fight she believes in” and the “cause” she “believes deeply in” and the “next phase” of the “journey” she’s embarking on and the “cause” again she wants to advance and maybe even one of the people she wants to “advocate alongside.”

Or maybe not. The need to not offend in order to raise the cash to clean up the debt has left Hillary inarticulate. What’s the real message of this letter?

(more…)

“Inquiry without object…”

Friday, June 27th, 2008

Sami Al-Arian’s story starts with a door knock. How it ends has thousands holding their breath.

Since 2003, the University of South Florida professor has been held at the government’s whim in jails all across Florida for allegedly spearheading a militant Palestinian “super-group.”

Super double-speak, yes?

This is a man Newsweek once called, “the premier civil rights activist in America for his efforts to repeal the use of secret evidence.” This is also a man that has personally met George W. Bush for his tireless civil rights advocacy.

With over 11 years of FBI wiretaps and searches, over $50 million spent on trial, 80 witnesses, 400 transcripts of intercepted phone conversations and faxes, and a result that failed to return a single guilty verdict on any of the 53 criminal counts, Arian is still being prosecuted by the American government.

Yesterday morning, prosecutors indicted Al-Arian for again declining to appear before a grand jury probing an Islamic charity in Northern Virginia. He has already spent an additional eighteen months in prison for refusing to testify.

As his lawyer, George Washington law professor Jonathan Turley said, “Dr. Al-Arian was held for a year on civil contempt for refusing to cooperate in a grand jury investigation. Under federal rules, the government is not allowed to use civil contempt confinement against a witness who clearly will not cooperate.”

Despite Al-Arian’s refusals and a global campaign supporting his non-compliance with the Justice Department, prosecutors insisted that Dr. Al-Arian would crack under pressure as a way to keep him incarcerated.

As of January 22, 2007, Al-Arian began a hunger strike that caused him to lose 55 pounds, endure kidney problems and other physical ailments until acquiesed to his family’s pleas after two months without food. In May 2007, Dr. Al-Arian was told by doctors that he was diagnosed with a hernia and that surgery was mandatory.

Al-Arian has now survived two grand juries. After the court granted a motion to lift the last contempt order, he began serving the remainder of his time from the plea agreement. This time was suspended during his civil contempt period – a fabulous way of extending his punishment.

As Turley said, “I wanted to express our great disappointment in the decision of the Justice Department to continue this effort to mete out punishment that it could not secure from a jury. Having lost the case in Florida, the Justice Department has openly sought to extend his confinement by daisy-chaining grand juries…”

“As in other cases, the government has given Dr. Al-Arian the choice of an obvious perjury trap or a contempt sanction. It is a choice that is obnoxious to our legal system and contrary to any standard of decency. The mistreatment of Dr. Al-Arian remains an international symbol of how the Bush Administration has discarded fundamental principles of fairness in a blind pursuit of retribution against this political activist.”

Read Sami Al-Arian’s 2007 plea to the Nobel Peace Center:

During the week of February 18, Dr. Sami Al-Arian’s family visited Oslo, Norway to attend the premiere of “USA vs. Al-Arian,” a critically-acclaimed documentary about Dr. Al-Arian’s case. On the second night of the week-long trip, Amnesty International-Norway held a special screening of the film, followed by a reception at the Nobel Peace Center, where Nahla Al-Arian spoke and read the following statement on behalf of Dr. Al-Arian:
February 19, 2007, Oslo, Norway

My name is Sami Al-Arian. I am a 49-year-old Palestinian, who has been living in the United States for 32 years. I’ve been persecuted and detained for the past four years because of my political beliefs and activism on behalf of the Palestinian cause.

The great Palestinian people have been victims of one of the cruelest crimes of the 20th century through no fault of their own. Unfortunately, this tragedy has continued through the 21st century as well.

Millions of Palestinians have been uprooted from the land of their ancestors while millions of others have been living under the brutal Israeli occupation for many decades.

At the heart of this appalling, systemic injustice is an exclusive and apartheid-like ideology that has exploited the suffering and persecution of European Jews.

I deeply believe that the path to enduring peace in the holy land is in the establishment of a non-sectarian, democratic, and binational state that is inclusive, where Palestinians and Israelis, Muslims, Christians, and Jews live in a pluralistic society that guarantees freedom, equality and justice for all.

Such a vision may be viewed by some as unrealistic because of the imbalance of power between the Palestinians and their occupiers. But I also firmly believe that might does not make right– and that the just and moral Palestinian struggle, when supported by the great majority of the peoples of the world, will ultimately prevail over injustice, oppression, and military power.

On behalf of the Palestinian people, I humbly offer my deepest thanks and appreciation to the noble and courageous Norwegian people, who, among all nations, have been at the forefront in their defense of universal values: human dignity, liberty and equality. I urge you to continue your solidarity, friendship, and support of the Palestinian people in their decades-long struggle for freedom, justice and peace.

Deprived of my own freedom, and from my cell in a U.S. prison, I foresee the day when true fraternity and a bond of humanity will overcome the ugliness of exclusiveness, injustice, and occupation. When Palestinians and Israelis live side by side, celebrate their common traditions and heritage and rejoice with the peoples of the world in the spirit of universal peace and understanding.

Clearly the old Arabic proverb personifies our Justice Dept.,

“A foolish man may be known by six things: Anger without cause, speech without profit, change without progress, inquiry without object, putting trust in a stranger, and mistaking foes for friends.”

“One of the greatest pieces of eyewash the country has ever seen…”

Thursday, June 26th, 2008

While everyone remains trigger happy about a ruling that just means that Fred Thompson and Robert Byrd can now have a pistol duel on the Capitol steps that would make Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr feel like the morons from L’Executer, the Supreme Court made an even bigger doozy this morning.

Exxon Valdez now must pay 1/10th of its punitive damages from an original amount of $4.5 billion to only $530 million. In the spill, Valdez had dumped 11 million US gallons of crude oil and contaminated about 1,300 miles of coastline, killed 500,000 seabirds, nearly 3,000 sea otters, 300 harbour seals, 250 bald eagles and up to 22 killer whales.

Will money bring back the Alaskan seabird? Will it bring back memories of the orca whale? No, but that’s why they’re called punitive damages, and the Supreme Court clearly thinks time erases mistakes.

By a 5-3 vote, the court ruled the original amount was excessive under federal maritime law. In the majority opinion, judge David Souter concluded that damages should be cut to the amount of “actual harm.” As he wrote, “We … hold that the federal statutory law does not bar a punitive award on top of damages for economic loss, but that the award here should be limited to an amount equal to compensatory damages.”

The damages would have been awarded to the 32,000 commercial fishermen, Alaskan property owners, natives and others harmed by the most devastating environmental sea disaster in recent history. At the height of the response, more than 11,000 personnel, 1,400 vessels and 85 aircraft were involved in the cleanup.

2,000 Alaskan plaintiffs have been waiting for their compensation since 1994. The Supreme Court’s action will reduce the average award from $75,000 to about $15,000.

(more…)

Choose, lose, or cash in

Thursday, June 26th, 2008

The mecca of youth culture is opening its airwaves to a different kind of advertising.

Sandwiched between ads for Trojan brand condoms and the newest albums, loyal MTV viewers will now be inundated with the flood of campaign ads leading up to the November election.

It’s the first time the network has decided to accept political advertising since it launched in 1981.

In an effort to keep the content clean, the birthplace of such cultural gems as Bevis and Butthead and Tila Tequila will only take ads from political candidates and party political committees — not 527s, which have come under fire recently as a legal loophole for launching smear campaigns.

MTV execs say the move will highlight its efforts to engage young eligible voters in the political process and promote a youth voice on the campaign trail (Most recently, get-out-the-vote PSAs featuring the tabloids starlets of “The Hills.”).

“It’s a good thing when candidates want to reach out to young people and the best way to do that is through MTV,” MTV’s Executive VP of Communications told industry rag TVNewser.

But let’s not kid ourselves — media buys are the ultimate cash cow on the campaign trail. Campaigns these days devote upwards of 80 percent of their total budget on “paid” media, and most of that goes to television buys. MTV declined to say how much it expects to make off the deals, but there’s no need to brush off that calculus text book to see that 80 percent of a campaign that is going to cost an estimated $1 billion ain’t no chump change.

Strategists think they’ve hit the goldmine in tapping into youth vote.

“Now campaigns have the opportunity to reach young voters in a venue where they congregate,” Democratic campaign strategist Tad Devine also told TVNewser.

A place where young voters congregate? Hasn’t he heard of the Facebook-YouTube phenomenon?

O Haiti, não é aqui

Wednesday, June 25th, 2008

Haitians protesting loan money promised for basic water infrastructure projects, promised 10 years ago

Six years ago, Brazilian singer Caetano Velosa penned of the most haunting songs about Haiti ever written, “And no matter if the eyes of the world may be for a moment turned off,” he pleaded, “Think of Haiti, pray for Haiti. Haiti is not here.”

And it won’t be here anytime soon.

Over $54 million in loans promised to the Haitian government by a subsidiary of the Treasury Department in 1998 have been suspended, as revealed in documents released yesterday by four independent human rights organizations.

Critics have called the lack of oversight by the Machiavellian American government in the incident, “one of the most egregious examples of malfeasance by the United States in recent years.”

With a GDP decline of -2% a year, 7% (300,000) of its children considered enslaved by the United Nations, 40% of the population devoid of access to elementary health care, 76% of births delivered by non-qualified personnel and an illiteracy rate of 45%, Haiti is indisputably the poorest country on Earth.

The loans were approved by the Inter-American Development Bank in 1998, originally intended for to improve the country’s sanitation system in the Haitian towns of Cayes and Port-de-Paix. Only 30 percent of Haiti in direct access to drinking water, which has lead to a scourge of dysentery and intestinal parasites.

Yet the IDB, over which the U.S. Treasury holds considerable influence, have failed to initiate projects involving water improvement, which the report said is, “largely the result of aggressive attempts by the U.S. government to block the disbursement of these loans.”

According to the Corruption Perceptions Index, an institute commissioned by the University of Passau in Germany, Haiti is considered by international scholars as the most politically corrupt nation in the world. Certainly, Haiti’s political turmoil and financial difficulties contributed to the delays, as the report consistently reinforces.

With over 50 years of military dictatorship, the current puppet government is a subordinate of the United States. Jean-Aristide was Haiti’s first democratically-elected president, taking office in 1990 amid great popular support. Yet having weathered a bloody military coup and enduring economic crises, he was booted out in February 2004 when opposition to his rule grew increasingly vicious.

(more…)