<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bell Tolls for Sarah Palin and Conservative Columnists Ring It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/09/26/the-bell-tolls-for-sarah-palin-and-conservative-columnists-ring-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/09/26/the-bell-tolls-for-sarah-palin-and-conservative-columnists-ring-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:11:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/09/26/the-bell-tolls-for-sarah-palin-and-conservative-columnists-ring-it/comment-page-1/#comment-9736</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popandpolitics.com/?p=5954#comment-9736</guid>
		<description>This Blog is a perfect example why people shouldn&#039;t read blogs. It&#039;s nothing but regurgitated opinions from other news stories or other blogs.  I you have a coherent opinion of an issue it would seem that it could just put down in words, but time after time I read blogs and all you see is quote after quote of other writings. 

Sorry to be so critical but, I was a little disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Blog is a perfect example why people shouldn&#8217;t read blogs. It&#8217;s nothing but regurgitated opinions from other news stories or other blogs.  I you have a coherent opinion of an issue it would seem that it could just put down in words, but time after time I read blogs and all you see is quote after quote of other writings. </p>
<p>Sorry to be so critical but, I was a little disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmyp</title>
		<link>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/09/26/the-bell-tolls-for-sarah-palin-and-conservative-columnists-ring-it/comment-page-1/#comment-9530</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmyp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popandpolitics.com/?p=5954#comment-9530</guid>
		<description>It,s interesting how certain parts of the press are saying that Sarah Palin is on the downslide. Is there a hidden agenda here? After all, Joe Biden is molded from the Gerald Ford school of goofy! To be honest, I would not vote for either one of these goofballs. Is this the best that America can come up with to lead our country? For anyone in America to even consider voting for McCain/Palin or Obama/Biden just goes to show that we as a nation are as a whole on the downslide! See if you don&#039;t agree eight years from now (probably before).By the way some of us are still waiting for Obama to prove that he is actually an American citizen and qualified to even run for President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It,s interesting how certain parts of the press are saying that Sarah Palin is on the downslide. Is there a hidden agenda here? After all, Joe Biden is molded from the Gerald Ford school of goofy! To be honest, I would not vote for either one of these goofballs. Is this the best that America can come up with to lead our country? For anyone in America to even consider voting for McCain/Palin or Obama/Biden just goes to show that we as a nation are as a whole on the downslide! See if you don&#8217;t agree eight years from now (probably before).By the way some of us are still waiting for Obama to prove that he is actually an American citizen and qualified to even run for President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Sannino</title>
		<link>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/09/26/the-bell-tolls-for-sarah-palin-and-conservative-columnists-ring-it/comment-page-1/#comment-9499</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Sannino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popandpolitics.com/?p=5954#comment-9499</guid>
		<description>I will tell you up front that I am a lifelong Democrat but I find no comfort in writing this comment for there is a REAL chance that this woman could be elected to office should McCain win the election.  Even more disconcerting than that is the fact that she could become President if McCain does not finish office his term which is not of of the realm of impossibility.

I do believe that she is a talented official and has probably done a lot for her state of Alaska.  She has not, however, reached that point in her career where she is qualified to be Vice President or, God for bid, President.  Her answers to Charles Gibson and Katie Couric are evidence of that.  Her inability to coherently answer questions that any &quot;seasoned&quot; politician should be able to answer was obvious to someone with a third grade education.  Also in her answers, she would move from one thought to another which could indicate a lack of focus.  Finally, her command of the English language when she tries to be &quot;folksy&quot; comes over quite disconcerting.  It is difficult for me to take her seriously so I can only imagine what type of impression that she would leave on a foreign dignatary.

All of this is the direct result of John McCain&#039;s extremely &quot;bad judgement&quot; in selecting her as his running mate.  He obviously did it because of the lack of enthusiasm of many republicans regarding his candidacy.  He tried to pick someone who would &quot;ignite&quot; his base and initially his trick worked.  However, it was extremely &quot;wreckless&quot; of him to select a candidate who was not vetted properly especially at a time when he pretends to continually say that he is concerned with &quot;country first.&quot;  

John McCain has probably done more harm to a woman whose political career &quot;could&quot; have been promising at some point in the future.  However, by placing her in th limeligt now when she is obviously not ready, he has probably ruined her career but he doesnt care because John McCain  selected her because he is thinking of &quot;John McCain first&quot;  and not &quot;country first!&quot;

Jack Sannino</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will tell you up front that I am a lifelong Democrat but I find no comfort in writing this comment for there is a REAL chance that this woman could be elected to office should McCain win the election.  Even more disconcerting than that is the fact that she could become President if McCain does not finish office his term which is not of of the realm of impossibility.</p>
<p>I do believe that she is a talented official and has probably done a lot for her state of Alaska.  She has not, however, reached that point in her career where she is qualified to be Vice President or, God for bid, President.  Her answers to Charles Gibson and Katie Couric are evidence of that.  Her inability to coherently answer questions that any &#8220;seasoned&#8221; politician should be able to answer was obvious to someone with a third grade education.  Also in her answers, she would move from one thought to another which could indicate a lack of focus.  Finally, her command of the English language when she tries to be &#8220;folksy&#8221; comes over quite disconcerting.  It is difficult for me to take her seriously so I can only imagine what type of impression that she would leave on a foreign dignatary.</p>
<p>All of this is the direct result of John McCain&#8217;s extremely &#8220;bad judgement&#8221; in selecting her as his running mate.  He obviously did it because of the lack of enthusiasm of many republicans regarding his candidacy.  He tried to pick someone who would &#8220;ignite&#8221; his base and initially his trick worked.  However, it was extremely &#8220;wreckless&#8221; of him to select a candidate who was not vetted properly especially at a time when he pretends to continually say that he is concerned with &#8220;country first.&#8221;  </p>
<p>John McCain has probably done more harm to a woman whose political career &#8220;could&#8221; have been promising at some point in the future.  However, by placing her in th limeligt now when she is obviously not ready, he has probably ruined her career but he doesnt care because John McCain  selected her because he is thinking of &#8220;John McCain first&#8221;  and not &#8220;country first!&#8221;</p>
<p>Jack Sannino</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/09/26/the-bell-tolls-for-sarah-palin-and-conservative-columnists-ring-it/comment-page-1/#comment-9463</link>
		<dc:creator>chris nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popandpolitics.com/?p=5954#comment-9463</guid>
		<description>All of the other emotions one has experienced with regard to Sarah Palin just give way to pity after watching this interview. Carville was right, she really is &quot;uniquely and supremely unqualified&quot; for national political office. I mean, when the National Review is pushing the panic button, you know the Republicans have a problem that&#039;s only going to get worse.

In retrospect, coming out with guns blazing at the RNC awoke a sleeping giant in the media. Left or right, Democrat or Republican, no one likes being called out. It was a reckless maneuver that helped create Gibson&#039;s Bush Doctrine question and the countless times Couric asks for specific examples to back the regurgitated talking points Palin puts forth in her initial responses.

This one&#039;s a slaughterhouse. I would love to watch Tucker Bounds watching Katie Couric watching Sarah Palin stammer and stutter her way through the Couric interview. Total train wreck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the other emotions one has experienced with regard to Sarah Palin just give way to pity after watching this interview. Carville was right, she really is &#8220;uniquely and supremely unqualified&#8221; for national political office. I mean, when the National Review is pushing the panic button, you know the Republicans have a problem that&#8217;s only going to get worse.</p>
<p>In retrospect, coming out with guns blazing at the RNC awoke a sleeping giant in the media. Left or right, Democrat or Republican, no one likes being called out. It was a reckless maneuver that helped create Gibson&#8217;s Bush Doctrine question and the countless times Couric asks for specific examples to back the regurgitated talking points Palin puts forth in her initial responses.</p>
<p>This one&#8217;s a slaughterhouse. I would love to watch Tucker Bounds watching Katie Couric watching Sarah Palin stammer and stutter her way through the Couric interview. Total train wreck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
