Much has been made of Barack Obama’s historic victory over John McCain for the presidency of the United States. The rise of a black man to the highest office in the land is indeed a major event in our history, but have race relations in the U.S. really made the advances we think Obama’s presidency signifies? Think again.
Although dear ol’ Lincoln enacted the Emancipation Proclamation around 150 years ago, and the civil and voting rights acts passed just under 50 years ago, most would argue that we haven’t made real progress until now. This election has been touted by many as the final and real end to the racial politics that prompted the civil war, but let’s check our assumptions.
Compare the map above, which appeared in The New York Times and shows which states went for which candidates in this month’s election, with the map below, which depicts the Union states in blue and the Confederate states in red (and the gray states didn’t exist):
Has much “changed”? Instead of a Union and a Confederacy, we now have a Blue America and a Red America. The divide is the same, the semantics are different.
Those who see the election of Barack Obama as indicative of a triumphant “change” in U.S. race relations are mistaken. If anything, this election points to the contrary. The idea of a black man becoming president is still unacceptable in the states that once called themselves Confederate.
The Civil War did not end because the southern states accepted their intolerance. Rather, the brute force of the Union states made southerners abandon their bigoted practices. These southerners are in the same situation today—but this time, the votes of the majority (as opposed to guns and ammo) are providing the push for them to accept a racially just outcome.
Celebrating the election of the first black president in U.S. history should not be overshadowed by these realities, but should give us some pause for what lies ahead. Not everyone is pleased that Barack Obama is our new president-elect and these folks will be watching and criticizing (and undermining) his every move. Obama may have won the election-night fight, but he still has a four-year battle ahead of him.
We can only hope that his term in office will bring about much needed political and economic change, but also, and most importantly, a substantial transformation that will end this country’s long history of racial intolerance.
Tags: Barack Obama, civil war, election 08, John McCain, mccain, obama



Just like my voting for Obama had nothing to do with his race, I would be shocked if most of the votes of McCain in the south had anything to do with his race. It cheapens the electoral process, party system, etc to turn this into “people voting for or against a black man.”
Those same states would have gone red if John Edwards were the candidate of the Dems.
I disagree with Alice slightly, the map wouldn’t have been exactly the same if John Edwards were running. Edwards didn’t run for the North Carolina Senate seat again because he was pretty sure he couldn’t win. So I don’t think he would have won his home state if he were the nominee for President.
Meanwhile Obama does win in NC, and Va, and Flor- all “confederate” states. And Missouri went for McCain. This is a great moment for Democrats, and America, because we elected a smart, honest man who happens to be half-black. And trying to paint us as racially divided only cheapens the moment.