Six Apart Offers a Bailout Program for Journalists—Including Me

Monday, November 24th, 2008

With the economy in serious trouble, automakers and financial institutions are seeking a government bailout. And the banks and financial folks got one to the tune of $700 billion. Well, The New York Times recently reported that Six Apart, the maker of Moveable Type blogs called TypePad, has created a bailout program of their own: “The Journalist Bailout Program.” (Spoiler alert—they interviewed me!)

The new initiative is designed to help journalists who recently lost their jobs get back on their feet. Once accepted into the program, Six Apart will give 20 to 30 individuals a TypePad pro blog with full technical support (worth about $150 a year), inclusion in its advertising program (which is an opportunity to earn money) and his or her blog featured on Blogs.com, a blog aggregator site. Six Apart’s Moveable Type software and platform is used by some great sites like Barack Obama’s campaign site, The Washington Post, and NPR—just to name a few. This is a huge gesture and generous offering for struggling journalists who may need both financial and technical help to start blogging.

About a week or so ago, I saw a Tweet about the program. (I’m a bigger Twitter user and advocate.) So, I immediately clicked on the link and saw blogger and Six Apart vice president, Anil Dash’s, blog post about the opportunity.

Dash wrote: “Hello, recently-laid-off or fearful-of-layoffs journalist! We’re Six Apart (you know us as the nice folks who make Movable Type or TypePad, which maybe you used for blogging at your old newspaper or magazine) and we want to help you.”

I read Dash’s invitation and thought the program was perfect for me. Although I haven’t been laid-off, I’m concerned about the availability of jobs for myself, fellow journalists and graduating students. And as I said in the New York Times article, this program is perfect for journalists who now have to build their careers more guerrilla-style by constantly selling their stories and promoting their work. I viewed the “bailout program” as an opportunity to increase the visibility of my stories and the chance to earn some revenue from my work. I’m hoping to take my site, CaramelBella.com, and another online site in the works to the next level.

The media industry is changing to a world where journalists have to be entrepreneurs and good marketers, as well as great writers. Writers who are solely depending on writing and hoping for success, are doing themselves a great disservice. We need to be writing and promoting. Journalists can’t afford (literally) to be quiet wallflowers.

And I know for many journalists, the current state of the industry is discouraging and depressing. Lately, the future of journalism is all we talk about in class and in the real world. Yet despite the seemingly bad news and continuous layoff reports, I’m optimistic about the possibilities and opportunities. Yes, there are less “traditional” jobs with big media organizations, but there are new opportunities being created, especially online, even as I type.  And I’m jazzed about that.

Internet Trolls Cross the Line with the Latest Internet Suicide

Monday, November 24th, 2008

Abraham Biggs, a 19-year-old college student, committed suicide last week in front of his Web cam, after first posted a link on a bodybuilding site inviting people to watch. Twelve hours after Biggs took a combination of opiates and benzodiazepine and went to sleep on his father’s bed at his home in Pembroke Pines, Florida, police arrived. The Web cam was still running and people were still checking in on Biggs’ status.

According to the Associated Press, which has a full description of the events leading up to Biggs’ suicide, this wasn’t the first time that someone has killed himself while broadcasting online. But the response from some of the viewers of Biggs’ Web cam has led to questions about behavior on the Internet—is there not some line (encouraging a troubled teenager to kill himself) that shouldn’t be crossed?

The Web site that hosted Biggs’ Web cam, justin.tv, has deleted the video and the comments people made while viewing it. The AP spoke to someone who claimed to have viewed the suicide and reported that as Biggs lay on the bed, other viewers cracked jokes. When police officers entered the room, in addition to “OMG” responses, viewers posted “lol” and “hahahah.”

An investigator for the local medical examiner’s office told the AP that before Biggs killed himself, some viewers encouraged him not to do it, others egged him on, and still more debated how big a dose of pills he needed to take for it to be effective.

The beauty of the Internet, of course, is that we’re all as invisible as we want to be. It is highly unlikely that investigators will be able to track down all the people who encouraged Biggs to kill himself, either because it will take too much time or because the viewers are simply untraceable.

The Biggs case has echoes of another instance of suicide precipitated by Internet users. Jury selection is currently under way in the trial of Lori Drew, an adult who created a fake MySpace profile of a teenage boy and used it to torment one of her daughter’s former friends, Megan Meier. (This New Yorker story has the gripping and haunting details.) Meier killed herself after the fake boy said hurtful things about her.

While Biggs was taking medication for bipolar disorder and Meier for depression, the more interesting connection is the role Internet trolls played in both cases. After Lori Drew’s connection to Megan Meier’s death was made public, the Drew family quickly became the target of the trolls’ wrath. They learned the Drew address and telephone number, harassed the family and made death threats.

With Biggs, the trolls weren’t just responding to someone’s death—they were implicitly involved in it. One could argue that in the Meier case, the trolls gave Lori Drew the punishment she deserved—they were the good guys. But watching as someone takes a handful of pills, and possibly encouraging him to do so? That has to show a complete lack of morals. At least stop watching the Web cam. [Ed note—or, you know, call the police?]

In August, the New York Times Magazine attempted to enter the world of the Internet troll, and asked if there was a line that shouldn’t be crossed. One notorious troll, Weev, argued that posting bright, flashing images on an epilepsy forum site was going too far. In a later interview with the Web site Corrupt, he identified the moral limits to trolling. “Goodness, beauty, and the meek are valued amongst my comrades and I,” Weev said.

Presumably a 19-year old bipolar college student is one of the meek. But what to make of the viewers who laughed at his death (even when others attempted to notify Web site administrators about the serious situation)? Maybe, in the unregulated life of the Internet, the only recourse we have for viewers who mocked Abraham Biggs is to hope the trolls do find them, and teach them some lesson they surely deserve.

Is there anything worse than hearing about a suicide watch-party and joining in? Making a list of more depraved behavior (watching a rape or murder) makes me hope even our morally suspect online personas don’t allow us to sink that low.

Monday Movie Report: Bite Me!

Monday, November 24th, 2008

In case you hadn’t heard, Twilight completely sucked at the box office. Yes, it sucked the young, female blood of American capitalism in the dark, cool night of the weekend to the tune of $71 million. This is, in the land of Hollywood power brokers, big news. More on that, as Marketplace says, “after the numbers…”

Apparently, so-so reviews didn’t sap too much of Bond’s strength. Quantum Of Solace pulled in over $27 mil in its second domestic weekend. US total: $110 mil. Worldwide: $418 million!

Poor Bolt. Not only did he get lost and have to find out he wasn’t really a superdog, he also had to open against a bunch of vampires and Bond’s second week. He did okay, pulling in $27 mil. Hardly a success by Disney standards, for now, but execs are expecting it to do well over the family, er, holiday, weekend.  (Side note: I have been seeing commercials for Bolt for what seems like months, but it wasn’t until last week that I finally caught that this movie is IN 3-D! Two points: A) Seriously, crap job marketing that, Disney. I definitely should have realized that earlier. B) Is 3-D really going to make it? I saw Beowulf last year, and, yes, it was absolutely friggin’ horrible, but the 3-D was kind of cooooool! I dug it. Kind of makes me want to go see Bolt…)

Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa continued to bring the crowds over the weekend, adding $16 mil to its coffers. Perhaps it’s maintaining momentum on the basis of its “So nice, you should see it twice” ad campaign. The flick has a lot going for it: franchise name-recognition, famous voices (Ben Stiller, Chris Rock, David Schwimmer), and, obviously, talking animals, which tend to do well (see: Chihuahua, Beverly Hills).

Finally, Role Models rounded out the pack, taking $7 mil from whatever audience was left. Not exactly Anchorman status, but RM is doing pretty well in the face of some tough competition.

Now, back to Twilight: If you haven’t noticed, ladies aren’t the treasured audience that the boys are. Transformers, James Bond (although one could argue he’s for the ladies, these days), Hellboy—all marketed to the swinging dicks that produce them. Warner Brothers made news earlier this year by saying they would no longer produce movies with female leads.

Sell now, WB stockholders.

Twilight’s stellar opening, with 65 percent of the audience female, suggests that women can drive box office success, a notion that was hinted at when Sex and the City and Mamma Mia broke into the top ten grossers earlier this year. (In contrast, zero movies with female leads made it into the top ten in 2007… or in 2006… in 2005, Mr. and Mrs. Smith eeked its way into the ten spot. 2004: none. 2003: none. 2002: My Big Fat Greek Wedding (!). 2001: none. 2000: none. Seeing a pattern here?)

Unlike those other two movies, though, Twilight has neither big-name stars nor an audience over 30. This is not your mom’s chick flick. With a box office take of $71 mil in its first weekend, and reportedly costing about $35 mil to produce, you can expect Hollywood’s movers and shakers to take note, and a rash of pics marketed to young women to hit the market in three… two… one…

That is, if there is anyone left to act in them! SAG leadership is seeking authorization from its members for a walk-out since the weekend mediation session stalled. Tucked inside this little nugget of gossip are allegations that the AMPTP hasn’t been honoring its residuals deal with the WGA, which, if you recall, went on strike last year over the same issue.

Given the economic conditions, the failure of last year’s strike, and the apparent unwillingness of the AMPTP to budge on the issue, SAG leadership might want to ask themselves if this is really the best next step.

Daily News Roundup: Turkeys, turkeys, and more turkeys

Monday, November 24th, 2008


Turkeys don’t sedate you with tryptophan, but they may give you a superbug. Apparently, when turkey farmers dope their birds to keep them from getting sick, they may also be creating super-resilient bacteria, much the way people do when they don’t complete a full round of antibiotics. Somehow it doesn’t seem this news will stop many people from gobbling them up on Thursday, anyway.

A samurai-sword wielding assailant was shot dead in front of the Hollywood Scientology center. The guard who shot him said he was close enough to hurt them when he fired. Word is, he used to be a member, but not many details have been released, yet. The controversial, star-magnet church hit the media limelight again when anti-Scientology protesters demonstrated outside the preview of Arthur Miller’s “All My Sons” because Katie Holmes, wife of the religion’s most famous celebrity, Tom Cruise, has a starring role.

Kanye West gave his award to a fellow artist after he won at the American Music Awards Sunday night—among other interesting moments. Here’s the scorecard.

The first black presidency already may have sparked a rash of violence coming from white extremists. The Ku Klux Klan is making a comeback, and violent hate crimes have been on the rise in the three weeks following the election of Democrat Barack Obama, according to an L.A. Times article. Looks like to become post-racial we may yet need to iron out a few wrinkles.

Obama supporters are beginning to worry he’s not as far to the left as they hoped. Much of his future administration is shaping up to be Clinton and Bush holdovers, calling his campaign for change into question. Of course, he has chosen several close friends and associates to serve in his Cabinet or as senior advisers. And Wall Street, at least, seems to appreciate his pick for Treasury Secretary, though many of his views remain a mystery.

The Pope apparently doesn’t have much faith in interfaith conversations. In a letter to a scholar-politician, portions of which were published in an Italian newspaper, Pope Benedict XVI said “interreligious dialogue in the strict sense of the word is not possible,” though that hasn’t prevented the Vatican from meeting with Muslim leaders to find common positions on issues such as terrorism and religious freedom. Meanwhile, in Southern California, Jewish college students visited mosques as part of a national “twinning campaign” in which Jews and Muslims team up to fight Islamophobia and anti-Semitism.

Citigroup: add one more bailout to the pile. The government has approved a deal to secure about $306 billion in loans and securities and to directly invest $20 billion in the company. It was the third time in three months the government has tried to contain the unraveling financial crisis.

Hollywood’s chewing its cheeks over the same-sex marriage ban. It’s a place that has celebrated free speech and weathered the McCarthyist witch hunts. Now Hollywood insiders who supported Prop 8 are being “outed.” Film Independent has gotten flak for defending Richard Raddon, the director of the L.A. Film Festival, who donated $1,500 to the Yes on 8 campaign. And the director of a nonprofit theater organization in Sacramento resigned after complaints of his donations to the campaign.

Classic Journalism: Joan Didion’s 74 Years of Magical Thinking

Monday, November 24th, 2008

My first experience with Joan Didion began when I picked up The Year of Magical Thinking in a thrift store in Cambridge, England. It was her most recent book—published in 2005—and one of the most life-changing, perspective-altering, soul-calming pieces of literature I have ever mentally consumed. The novel is a memoir that begins with her husband’s sudden death due to cardiac arrest while their daughter Quintana is in a coma due to septic shock from pneumonia. Quintana dies less than a year later. Didion loses the two most important people in her life in one foul swoop from 2003 to 2004 and approximately 240 pages.

It sounds depressing. But for anyone who has ever dealt with the strange, inexplicable feelings that we label “grief”, The Year of Magical Thinking is soothing. In her usual magical way, Didion succeeds in articulating the unarticulatable. She explores her own feelings—an oscillation between numbness and shock—with a level of detail that seems much more natural than most literature written about death. There is no sugar-coating, and sometimes the world can look a little dark, but there is a surprising amount of beauty in the shadows.

Didion, now 74-years old, has written 14 books in her lifetime—five of which are fiction—as well as five screenplays and countless articles for Vogue and Time. An avid reader since childhood, she has also regularly contributed to The New York Review of Books since 1973. In November 2005, she was awarded the National Book Award in the category of non-fiction for The Year of Magical Thinking. In 2007, Didion’s “distinctive blend of spare, elegant prose and fierce intelligence” was recognized by the National Book Foundation with a medal for Distinguished Contribution to American Letters. The Writer’s Guild of America decorated her with the Evelyn F. Burkey Award that same year.

But Didion’s greatest distinction is her unparalleled connection to California. In her review of Didion’s 1979 work The White Album, Michiko Kakutani crowned Didion California’s official journalist. If Kilimanjaro belongs to Ernest Hemingway, Oxford, Mississippi, belongs to William Faulkner, and Honolulu belongs to James Jones—“California belongs to Joan Didion,” wrote Kakutani.

Los Angeles, too, became the property of Joan Didion when she composed the vignette “Los Angeles Notebook,” published in her 1968 essay collection Slouching Towards Bethlehem. It was this particular essay that fused Didion with my writer’s soul indefinitely. Very few writers can capture Los Angeles in anything more than a superficial way. Truly interpreting the landscape is like catching a glimpse of Sasquatch, or stumbling upon the crumbling top point of an Ancient Egyptian pyramid buried deep beneath the sand, or witnessing the glistening neck of the Loch Ness Monster stretch beyond the lid of a Scottish lake for little more than an instant.

Raymond Chandler captured it with ease in his short story “Red Wind,” which describes the ominous, unsteady feeling brought to Los Angeles by the Santa Ana wind. After reading “Red Wind” some years ago, I never for a moment thought that the Santa Ana wind would belong to any author other than Chandler. It takes a person of exceptional perception to capture the tone-change—the ethereal flicked switch—that accompanies the desert wind, and Chandler must have squeezed blood from his spiritual peripheral vision to do it. But exactly 30 years later, Didion squeezed too.

There is something uneasy in the Los Angeles air this afternoon, some unnatural stillness, some tension. What it means is that tonight a Santa Ana will begin to blow a hot wind from the northeast whining down through the Cajon and San Gorgonio passes, blowing up sandstorms out along Route 66, drying the hills and the nerves to the flash point. For a few days now we will see smoke in the canyons, and hear sirens in the night. I have neither heard nor read that a Santa Ana is due, but I know it, and almost everyone I have seen today knows it too. We know it because we feel it. The baby frets. The maid sulks. I rekindle a waning argument with the phone company, then cut my losses and lie down, given over to whatever it is in the air. To live with the Santa Ana is to accept, consciously or unconsciously, a deeply mechanistic view of human behaviour.

The Santa Ana wind, Didion tells us, is a foehn wind—a malevolent force that causes headaches, nausea and restlessness. It is a mythological and a scientific wind. Native Indians would throw themselves into the sea when this bad wind blew. In Switzerland, suicide rates increase during a foehn. In Los Angeles, some teachers suspend classes because children become unmanageable during a foehn. “A few years ago an Israeli physicist discovered that not only during such winds, but for the ten or twelve hours which precede them, the air carries an unusually high ratio of positive and negative ions,” writes Didion. “…What an excess of positive ions does, in the simplest terms, is make people unhappy. One cannot get much more mechanistic than that.”

Perception is Didion’s extinguishing characteristic as a writer, but contextual detail is her forte as a journalist. She lays the scene and brings the reader to a point of hungry anticipation: I see it, the reader says. Now tell me what I should think of it. Didion is the trusted guide. She is the vital organs. She is the eyes, the brain and the heart.

“We tell ourselves stories in order to live,” writes Didion in the opening of The White Album. But for writers like Joan Didion it’s the other way around. Writers who are able, so naturally, to capture complete moments in time and transform blank pages and blank thoughts with them—live in order to tell stories.

Slouching Toward Bethlehem