irs

Pastors Take Politics Into Their Own Hands

Monday, September 29th, 2008

I thought we had a separation of church and state in the United States. Apparently, some ministers overlooked that memo.

This past Sunday, Christian ministers across the country took the laws into their own hands by telling their congregations to vote for John McCain.

According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, at least 33 ministers knew they were breaking the federal tax law but chose to do so anyway in protest.

“As Christians, it’s clear we should vote for John McCain,” said Rev. Fran Pulto of Calvary Chapel in Philadelphia in the Journal article. “He is the only candidate I believe a Christian can vote for.”

For these pastors, pushing conservative social values involving abortion and gay marriage were worth the IRS investigation.

Several Christian and evangelical ministers joined forces with the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal-aid group, which has long argued that the tax code barring clergy from backing candidates from the pulpit is unconstitutional. The ADF, along with these ministers, hopes that the law will be overturned. The protesting ministers are responsible for forwarding the transcript of their sermons to the IRS. Lucky for them, the Alliance Defense Fund promises to represent any pastors who are investigated.

Although economic issues are heavy on the minds of most Americans right now, the impact of religion on politics and the 2008 presidential election cannot be understated. Spiritual beliefs influence political agendas. Is it lawfully and ethically OK for ministers to use their pulpit to endorse and criticize particular candidates?

Currently, there isn’t a law prohibiting ministers from using their freedom of speech for making personal endorsements. However, using their nonprofit churches, with their tax-exempt status, to support a political candidate seems to be a breach of the separation of church and state. Let’s see what the courts say.

The weekend roundup: habeas schmabeas

Monday, June 16th, 2008

gitmo

Last Friday, hot on the heels of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling that Guantanamo Bay detainees have the right to challenge their imprisonment in the US Court System, Sen. John McCain called it “one of the worst decisions in the history of this country.

Really, John?  Was that hyperbole, like when your mom orders the Monte Cristo and calls the lunch “the worst I have ever had” because the cole slaw had too much mayo?

Or the type of “worst decision” that one would apply when discussing the needless squandering of international political capital in the Arab world in the face of an extensive McClatchy Newspapers investigation which shows the Gitmo boogeymen were (and are) not, as you and your misinformed brethren insist, “the worst of the worst”?

If the former detainees whom McClatchy interviewed are any indication — and several former high-ranking U.S. administration and defense officials said in interviews that they are — most of the prisoners at Guantanamo weren’t terrorist masterminds but men who were of no intelligence value in the war on terrorism.

In addition to claiming that legislation he helped passed all but assured the civil treatment of detainees at Gitmo — or en route there — McCain also claimed that of the people let go, several were apprehended attacking US forces in Iraq, proving their nature as dangerous individuals.

(more…)