jeremiah wright

A Trip Down Memory McLane: Rev. Wright is Wrong Issue

Monday, October 6th, 2008

As the McCain campaign renews attacks from the primary season regarding Barack Obama’s associations with William Ayers and Rev. Jeremiah Wright, it is worth pointing out that this is coming from a man who promised to run a clean campaign. McCain even went so far as to call Rev. Wright a moot issue (see above interview clip with Sean Hannity).

Granted, it is Sarah Palin’s role to be the attack dog, but the diversionary tactic is all the same.

With the Dems winning the two debates thus far (according to polls), a Republican-led economic crisis, and a widening gap in crucial battleground states—capped by the Republicans’ stunning pullout from Michigan, the GOP has little recourse but to desperately shift the conversation to the least substantive of topics.

Steve Schmidt may have gotten Ahnuld, Alito, John Roberts, and G-Dub (part deux) through the grinder unscathed, but when the economy is being dragged through the gutter by excessive deregulation that has defined Republican platforms for at least two decades, the guilt-by-association smear tactics may prove too superficial to distract voters from their financial woes.

Holy hip-hop

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

It’s no secret that the black church is more outspoken than say, my regular Sunday Catholic church service. I suppose we should give credit to the Rev. Wright controversy for that heightened realization (although I gather most people presumed this long before that YouTube clip hit every media outlet this side of the Milky Way).

But church sermons aren’t the only part of the service adopting that sort of rhythm and bluntness. Church music is increasingly taking on hip-hop beats to spread the word of the gospel. I spent several weeks with the young people at Crenshaw Christian Center in South-Central Los Angeles and documented their efforts at the unlikely combination of rap music and God in the video below.

This video was embedded using the YouTuber plugin by Roy Tanck. Adobe Flash Player is required to view the video.

The weekend roundup

Monday, May 5th, 2008

hagee wright

Last week saw the continued brow-beating of the American people with Jeremiah Wright overkill. The first 16 minutes of Meet the Press were devoted to it. CNN, FoxNews, and the whole lot continue to replay the YouTube clips. I’ve even seen some ridiculous implications in the more whacked-out portions of the blogsophere that Obama and Wright are co-conspirators in a murder.

As the Democratic primary slogs on, it seems people really can’t get enough of this sensationalism, like all of the real issues have now been exhausted and the entire affair is reduced to a pseudo-meditation on race in America. If that’s what people really want to talk about, why not replay clips of Obama’s speech in March over and over again? Seems a bit more comprehensive than Wright’s sermons.

Frank Rich wrote a brilliant op-ed for the New York Times over the weekend discussing the double-standard in the media on the coverage of Wright/Obama vs. Hagee/McCain.

None of this is to say that two wacky white preachers make a Wright right. It is entirely fair for any voter to weigh Mr. Obama’s long relationship with his pastor in assessing his fitness for office. It is also fair to weigh Mr. Obama’s judgment in handling this personal and political crisis as it has repeatedly boiled over. But whatever that verdict, it is disingenuous to pretend that there isn’t a double standard operating here. If we’re to judge black candidates on their most controversial associates — and how quickly, sternly and completely they disown them — we must judge white politicians by the same yardstick.

Meanwhile, as our country is engaged in multiple fronts of war, all in the name of combating “terror,” a recent MSNBC article discusses the failure of the US government to work with Yemen in retaining many of the suspects in the USS Cole bombing. The suspects have either escaped or been outright freed by the Yemeni government as the US made several unsuccessful attempts at forcing extradition. Two went on to commit suicide attacks in Iraq.

(more…)

The spectacle of it all

Thursday, May 1st, 2008

corpseflower

Against the cold, scientific glow of an unlikely, biology-inspired observation, I wonder, is this what we have been reduced to?

A New York Times/CBS News poll conducted from Friday to Tuesday- right in the thick of the latest Jeremiah Wright flap- indicates that only 51% of Democrats believe Obama will win his party’s nomination, down from 69% just a month ago.

As I have watched the second Wright controversy unfurl its stench in the licentious fertility of the mainstream media rainforest, I can’t help but think of a blossoming Amorphophalus titanum- a.k.a. the corpse flower.

“First you need to understand how the flower reproduces. The flower tries to mimic a rotting corpse so that it can attract sweat flies, which lay their eggs in rotting flesh,” says a BBC article.

It “wafts out this fragrance that attracts basically any insect that would be attracted to a rotting animal carcass,” an expert says in another article. The flower is a novelty. When it blooms in captivity, despite the horrid smell, people flock from all over to gawk at the spectacle of a plant that must lure bottom feeders so that it may dupe the pea-brained insects into pollinating its own, soon-to-be dead carcass.

(more…)

Obama’s aura recast in basic black

Thursday, March 20th, 2008
obama_oahuan79.jpg
  Hybrid Obama: shaken up, all over again.


Obama bet his fantastically successful candidacy on his ability to remain unmoored from what makes us so uncomfortable— America’s racial history, and more specifically, America’s relationship to its descendants of African slaves. As of his March 19th speech on race relations, that freely floating candidacy has been securely anchored right where he did not want it to be.

Obama told CNN’s Anderson Cooper, “In some ways, this controversy has actually shaken me up a little bit and gotten me back into remembering that the odds of me getting elected have always been lower than those of some of the other conventional candidates.”

Reminded him? Please. If he ever forgot, he certainly hasn’t the smarts to lead this country out of its current morass— and he has. He did not forget. He wanted us to forget… when it was convenient for his campaign. When he could gin up black support by accusing Clinton surrogates of racism, he remembered. Let’s face it, the man has done a brilliant job of playing both ends against the middle. Now, however, the jig is up. With the Jeremiah Wright controversy and the ensuing speech (which was far less an act of political bravery than political necessity, intelligently and elegantly handled), he’s acknowledged his ties to Afro-American culture and the distasteful light it shines on American history. He has attached himself to everything he once told America he would let them forget (Pardon me… transcend). We will not look at him the same way again.

Kevin Drum wrote:

“I think Obama’s fervent hope is that his speech pretty much closes the issue of race in this campaign. It just flatly doesn’t help him in any way to keep it on the front burner. Like NAFTA, which dropped off the radar after Ohio, I expect that after a couple of days Obama will also drop the subject of race if he possibly can. We’ll know by next week.”

No doubt that is his hope. But his aura has shifted. He has associated himself with that which, frankly, the majority of Americans don’t want to discuss, have a dialog about, confront or do the work to overcome. He has associated himself with some of the ugliest aspects of this nation’s past, things from which we’ve averted our eyes throughout most of our history. We have no desire to stop now. And henceforth, when we look at Obama, we can easily see some aspect of it.

When he first announced his candidacy, I assumed he was going to follow a successful model. I assumed he wanted to inure America to his black face and his adoption of Afro-American culture. This first run, I assumed, would allow all the poisons that lurked in the mud to hatch out. It would allow him to confront racial/cultural issues and race-based attacks. Doing so, he would make enemies, and he would lose, but the process would elevate his standing and stature. He would then spend the next four or eight years as a leader in various national and international fields, prepped to win in 2012 or 2016.

The model is Hillary Clinton’s. During her husband’s first campaign, she attacked gender issues head-on (artlessly, grant you). She talked about “standing by her man” and baking cookies, and got attacked from all sides. She made clear that she would not play the passive role assigned to her. For that pronouncement, she made enemies, most of whom still hate her with a psychotic passion. That dirty work done, however, she set about building a reputation based on the non-traditional role she had assumed. She won herself a senate seat, burnished a reputation as a hard worker, and got closer than any other woman could to becoming the Democratic presidential nominee.

I don’t know if it was Obama’s bi-racial background or his knowledge of his genetic freedom from the historic chains of Afro-American culture, but he seemed to believe he could avoid confronting “race” head-on, and thus make no enemies. He was wrong. Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo reports that “The co-founder of Laura Ingraham’s radio show, who now helps run Hugh Hewitt’s ‘Salem Radio Network,’ has mixed an Obama video interweaving Obama with Malcolm X, the Black Power salute at the Mexico City Olympics and Public Enemy’s ‘Fight the Power’.”

Yes. Obama’s aura has shifted, and this is how the game is played when you’re clothed in basic American black.

There’s an apocryphal story involving opera singers, including two black divas, sitting backstage. One of the black women reads a review. She grows agitated. “The black diva, the black diva… why is it always the black diva,” she roars and storms from the room. The others sit in silent discomfort.

“Someone had to tell her,” says the remaining black diva.