john edwards

Breakfast bites: morning news roundup

Thursday, July 31st, 2008

And now…make-up sex: After 140 years of sleeping on the couch in Black America, the House of Representatives has issued a formal apology for “the institution of slavery, and the subsequent Jim Crow laws that for years discriminated against blacks as second-class citizens in American society,” NPR reports.  As the Washington Post points out, though, this comes after apologies were issued to Native and Japanese Americans.  They even drafted a bill to classify the Ottoman Turk cleansing of Armenians during WWI as genocide (it failed).  Not that that any xenophobic or racist act is less severe than another, but say what? It took us this long to get around to making formal amends with the African American community?  ”Such efforts were always bogged down by concerns that the apology would prompt a greater call for reparations for slavery,” says the Post article.  In a word: weaksauce.  We all know that Tron would win it all in a dice game anyways.

That’s hot: The McCain campaign, bolstered by the same, Steve Schmidt-led team that helped G-Dub edge out the ketchup dude in 2004, is launching an all out assault to “define Mr. Obama as arrogant, out of touch and unprepared for the presidency,” according to the New York Times.  This from the 71-year-old who called himself completely computer illiterate.  Apparently the first step is to equate him with Britney Spears and Paris Hilton in the minds of voters with a new TV spot.  The Obama campaign fired back, claiming this isn’t the John McCain that lamented personal attacks and vowed to take the high road.  I say they’re both coming off like a bunch of whiners right now.  Can we get to the debates already?

Nobody’s a hipster: If you thought TMZ.com getting more hits than all of the major newspapers sites combined signaled the end of society as we know it, you were wrong!  It’s actually hipsterdom, that vast cultural black hole, leeching all that is sacred and cool from all past counter-culture movements, according to Douglas Haddow over at AdBusters.  There are too many hyperbolic gems in this piece to relay here, but “the dance floor at a hipster party looks like it should be surrounded by quotation marks” should give you a feel for the tone.  The social constructs of the word “hipster,” and the seeming phobia of the word by all who outwardly identify themselves as one are dissected in the piece.  Last I checked AdBusters was a pretty hipsterish (gasp!) site, though.  Pot?  Kettle?  Chicken?  Egg?  Who cares, it’s a fun read.

(more…)

Coolness and candor in New Hampshire

Monday, January 7th, 2008

change1nh.jpg

KEENE, N.H.— “Change” has trumped all of the other 2008 campaign buzz-words— words like “experience” “trust” “reliability.” It has come to dominate the rhetoric on the campaign trail and conversations across party lines. It was “change” that catapulted Obama to victory in Iowa, pushed Edwards into a second-place finish and edged its way into Hillary’s carefully crafted pitch, morphing her message of tested leadership into a warning that it takes experience to effect change. Obama is the Democratic candidate that looks and speaks most like change and as a result has so far attracted the most supporters among young voters.

It’s no surprise that Gen-Y has embraced change as a hyper political mantra, and not just out of dissatisfaction with the Bush years. We’re always on, hooked-up and on hyper-drive, constantly surfing, texting and Facebook-messaging our way toward the next big thing— the latest technology, theory, fashion, music, art, YouTube post, drunken celebrity sighting, etc. We’re interested in change in a sped-up way, taking the avant-garde industrial-era impulse to digital extremes, acting inevitably on the consumerist marketing indoctrination we’ve endured as a culture for decades. Out with the old and in with the new. We are not the victims of a societal or generational Attention Deficit Disorder— or maybe we are. Mostly we’re just impatient. And the thing we want to know now is what kind of change are we talking about here, in New Hampshire, the day before the primary election of 2008? What are the actual differences in the changes the candidates are proposing and what are the differences in the perceptions of those proposed changes? What makes one politico’s vision of change cooler than another’s?

(more…)

Edwards in Burbank

Saturday, November 17th, 2007

edwards-brbank.jpg

Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards showed up at the Writers Guild of America strike yesterday at NBC studios in Burbank. He walked the picket line and then gave a brief shout out to the writers and to union members across industries in every part of the country. Unions are a bulwark against the corporate take over of America, he said. His speech has been covered here.

I was most impressed with the media covering the event.

(more…)

Kos campaigning

Wednesday, August 8th, 2007

This exchange on evil Washington lobbyists and the corruption of the democratic process took place at the Kos convention this past weekend. Maybe it was the setting and the audience of bloggers, maybe it’s because the candidates are increasingly embracing a new, more real, blog-influenced form of campaigning… whatever it was, this exchange has the feeling of actual communication. Edwards won’t take money from lobbyists. Obama agrees. Clinton dodges and gets mocked. She laughs and dodges some more and then comes back with what she really thinks. Nice. It looks like democratic politics. More of this please.

The MySpace race

Tuesday, July 17th, 2007

obama-myspace.png

There’s an adage that advises against mixing friends and money… but it must have been formulated before a presidential candidate could gain hundreds of thousands of virtual friends on the web, each with their own credit card.

The New York Times reported this week that Democratic presidential candidates have had more success than their Republican counterparts in channeling the infinite resources of the internet into their coffers, largely thanks to aggressive campaigning on social-networking sites.

Nearly all the candidates boast profile pages on Facebook or MySpace, the two most-popular networking sites and two of the most popular sites on the web. Facebook this month reported 30 million members worldwide and the number of MySpace users is at least double that amount.

Obama, who according to the Times is one of the leaders in online fundraising, has made more than 100,000 Facebook friends. His page boosts his image as the hipster candidatepartly by listing interests such as his favorite TV show: ESPN’s “Sportscenter.” Giuliani, who is lagging in online fundraising, has gone for a less friend-friendly approach, opting out of Facebook altogether and using a “private” MySpace page that welcomes only pre-approved friends. Why be choosy? When it comes to raising money, being an online-friend whore pays!

John Edwards, who the Times reports logs on to twenty-three social networking sites, has supplemented his profiles with casual punch e-mails, encouraging cyber-supporters by the hundreds of thousands to join the campaign.

The social-networking-site campaigns could quickly turn into a popularity contest better suited to a high school cafeteria. They’ve also already become another measure by which the mainstream press can frame the campaign as horse race long before people should be taking bets. Meantime, it’s an encouraging sign that politicians (or their advisers) are realizing that young people’s lack of interest in CSPAN and the nightly news doesn’t equal a lack of interest in politics. On the contrary, a lot of our phones and our laptops are synched to the newswires.