<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pop + Politics &#187; los angeles times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popandpolitics.com/tag/los-angeles-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popandpolitics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:30:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tribune Co. Bankrupt in the Bankâ€”and in the Soul</title>
		<link>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/12/09/newspaper-publishers-sooth-the-soul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/12/09/newspaper-publishers-sooth-the-soul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark evitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in depth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago tribune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eddy hartenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sam zell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tony hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popandpolitics.com/?p=10180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Tribune Company filed for bankruptcy protection on Monday, in a move to begin restructuring its debt. The Tribune Co., owner of the Chicago Tribune, the Los Angeles Times, and various television stations, has $7.6 billion in assets and owes $12.79 billion.
The publisher of the Tribune, Tony Hunter, wrote a letter to the paper&#8217;s readers, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.popandpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tribunetimes.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-10181" src="http://www.popandpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tribunetimes-420x301.png" alt="" width="378" height="271" /></a></p>
<p>The Tribune Company <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-081208tribune-bankruptcy,0,3718621.story">filed for bankruptcy protection</a> on Monday, in a move to begin restructuring its debt. The Tribune Co., owner of the <em>Chicago Tribune</em>, the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, and various television stations, has $7.6 billion in assets and owes $12.79 billion.</p>
<p>The publisher of the <em>Tribune</em>, Tony Hunter, <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-chicago-tribune-publisher-1208,0,1362721.htmlstory">wrote a letter</a> to the paper&#8217;s readers, pledging continued service in the face of adversity. In the letter, he worked to convince readers that the debt restructuring would serve them best.</p>
<blockquote><p>This restructuring is in Tribune&#8217;s best long-term interest. It will reduce pressure on our operating businesses, enabling us to pursue our vision of creating a sustainable, cutting-edge media company valued by our readers, viewers, and advertisers, and that plays a vital role in the communities we serve. In turn, this will help ensure our newspaper and online products continue to deliver the news, information and entertainment you can&#8217;t get anywhere else. It&#8217;s what you expect and what we&#8217;ll continue to deliver.</p></blockquote>
<p>At the <em>Times,</em> publisherÂ Eddy H. Hartenstein also <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-tribune-publishernote,0,4109653.story">wrote to assure readers</a> everything would be OK at the Tribune Co.</p>
<blockquote><p>This restructuring is in Tribune&#8217;s best long-term interest. It will reduce pressure on our operating businesses, enabling us to pursue our vision of creating a sustainable, cutting-edge media company that is valued by our readers, viewers and advertisers, and that plays a vital role in the communities we serve. That, in turn, will help keep this website showing up on your computer every day, offering you news, information and entertainment you can&#8217;t get anywhere else. It&#8217;s what you expect and what we&#8217;ll continue to deliver.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s right, Hunter andÂ Hartenstein&#8217;s letters are essentially the same. I wonder what poor schlub in the Tribune Co.&#8217;s legal department had to write it?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a moment to remember that the publishers of these papers certainly <em>do not</em> have the interests of their readers at heart. Hunter became publisher of the <em>Tribune</em> in <a href="http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2008/09/tony-hunter-named-chicago-tribune-publisher.html">late September</a>; Hartenstein, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/la-times-names-hartenstein-new/story.aspx?guid=%7BFBD33AAE-3693-4C48-935C-13E299B61967%7D">a month before</a>. The <em>Times</em> publisher&#8217;s prior job was with DirecTV.</p>
<p>Sam Zell, the CEO of Tribune, <a href="http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2008/12/sam_zells_statement_on_ba.php">in a letter to staff members</a>, said he was proud of the work everyone at the company had done. &#8220;Weâ€™ve reduced costs, gained market share, and laid the groundwork for creating a new business model out of traditional media,&#8221; he wrote.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no question newspaper companies have to figure out what the &#8220;new business model out of tradition media&#8221; is. But as Zell writes about Tribune&#8217;s &#8220;great brands,&#8221; he must remember that a brand that is only a shadow of its former self, and is primarily surviving on its name, is hardly a great brand anymore.</p>
<p>Will the <em>Times</em> and <em>Tribune</em> have to cut staff even more in the coming months? Maybe the papers&#8217; publishers need new assistants.Â After all, those letters to subscribers don&#8217;t write themselves.Â Actually, just one assistant will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/12/09/newspaper-publishers-sooth-the-soul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Watchdog: Newspapers Now Just a Keepsake</title>
		<link>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/11/07/now-just-a-keepsake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/11/07/now-just-a-keepsake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mark evitt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amuse bouche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago sun-times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commemorative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extra copies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popandpolitics.com/?p=8980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It looks like my print subscriptions to the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times might haveÂ actually earned me some money. That&#8217;s because, in the wake of Barack Obama&#8217;s historic election, the Wednesday edition of major newspapers are selling on eBay and Craigslist for upwards of $200.
Newspapers are printing hundreds of thousands of extra [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.popandpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/obamanytstore.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-9013" src="http://www.popandpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/obamanytstore.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="259" /></a></p>
<p>It looks like my print subscriptions to the <em>New York Times</em> and the <em>Los Angeles Times </em>might haveÂ actually earned me some money. That&#8217;s because, in the wake of Barack Obama&#8217;s historic election, the Wednesday edition of major newspapers are selling on eBay and Craigslist for <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/business/media/06paper.html?ref=media">upwards of $200</a>.</p>
<p>Newspapers are printing hundreds of thousands of extra copies and still selling out. <em>USA Today</em> increased its print run by 380,000 copies and <a href="http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=13687">sold them all</a>. The <em>Washington Post</em> tripled its newsstand rate to $1.50 and still sold out. In fact, it sold so many copies the paper ran off another 250,000 copies of Wednesday&#8217;s paper on Thursday. People <a href="http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=13685">lined up in front</a> of the <em>Chicago Sun-Times&#8217;</em> printing plant to buy copies practically straight from the baler. The examples go <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003887863">on</a> and <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003887861">on</a>.</p>
<p>This seems to indicate a couple of things about the state of print journalism. First, it puts into stark relief just how many people have dropped their subscriptions over the years. Of course, not every person of the millions who bought extra copies used to be a newspaper subscriber. But some certainly were, and it took a presidential election to get them to go out and buy a copy of the magazine.</p>
<p>More important is the concept of commemoration. The <em>Sun-Times</em> is selling framed copies of its <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/oprah/2008/11/oprah_winfrey_suntimes_obama_c.html">cover</a> for <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-newspapers6-2008nov06,0,3206942.story">$99</a>. The <em>Times </em>will send you a copy of Wednesday&#8217;s paper for $14.95, which includes a protective plastic sleeve. Newspaper companies that put their emphasis on their print product used to say newspapers were still valuable journalism because they provided context and analysis, something that couldn&#8217;t be delivered immediately. The millions of people buying these extra copies aren&#8217;t buying them for the news analysis, they&#8217;re buying them because it&#8217;s tangible proof of what happened on Tuesday night.</p>
<p>In some ways it&#8217;s gratifying that people still turn to papers in momentous times like these. But the newspaper is acting as little more than aÂ photo to frame.</p>
<p>This election was something more than the beginning of the end for print papersâ€”that happened long ago. This election was a true changing of the guard. Political sites like the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/">Huffington Post</a> and <a href="http://www.politico.com/">Politico</a> saw <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2112250/posts">huge increases</a> in page viewsâ€”HuffPo was up 472 percent compared to a year ago, and Politico was up 344 percent. Even traditional newspapers&#8217; Web sites saw <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2201942/">large increases</a> in traffic. Want to see more polling data? Go to <a href="http://www.pollster.com/">Pollster</a>, <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/">FiveThirtyEight</a> or <a href="http://www.270towin.com/">270toWin</a>, don&#8217;t wait for the newspapers to summarize their own polls for you later.</p>
<p>Granted, I said I subscribe to both the <em>New York Times</em> and the <em>Los Angeles Times,</em> which is unusual for someone my age. It&#8217;s mostly because I want something to read while eating breakfast, and the <em>L.A. Times</em> was practically giving the paper away. I certainly wasn&#8217;t waiting until Wednesday morning for my election analysis.</p>
<p>Newspapers love to write about themselves (see all that <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2188495/">self-congratulatory</a> Pulitzer coverage), so of course there were plenty of stories (previously linked to throughout this column) about the millions of extra newspapers printed to document Obama&#8217;s victory. And most of them had a slight air of gloating. &#8220;See, we aren&#8217;t dead yet!&#8221; the stories seemed to say.</p>
<p>Fair enough, but isn&#8217;t it a little sad for your goal to be stuffed in a protective sleeve, then stuffed in a closet and then likely never read again?</p>
<p>Related: Urb magazine founder <a href="http://pureroker.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-newspaper-cover-slide-show.html">Raymond Roker</a> compiled a cool slideshow of covers celebrating Obama&#8217;s win. Here&#8217;s a taste.</p>
<div><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="100" height="100" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="flashticker" /><param name="align" value="middle" /><param name="flashvars" value="cy=lt&amp;il=1&amp;channel=2594073385382055728&amp;site=widget-30.slide.com" /><param name="src" value="http://widget-30.slide.com/widgets/slideticker.swf" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="100" height="100" src="http://widget-30.slide.com/widgets/slideticker.swf" wmode="transparent" flashvars="cy=lt&amp;il=1&amp;channel=2594073385382055728&amp;site=widget-30.slide.com" align="middle" name="flashticker"></embed></object></p>
<div style="width: 500px; text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.slide.com/pivot?cy=lt&amp;at=un&amp;id=2594073385382055728&amp;map=1" target="_blank"><img src="http://widget-30.slide.com/p1/2594073385382055728/lt_t000_v000_s0un_f00/images/xslide1.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a href="http://www.slide.com/pivot?cy=lt&amp;at=un&amp;id=2594073385382055728&amp;map=2" target="_blank"><img src="http://widget-30.slide.com/p2/2594073385382055728/lt_t000_v000_s0un_f00/images/xslide2.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a href="http://www.slide.com/pivot?cy=lt&amp;at=un&amp;id=2594073385382055728&amp;map=F" target="_blank"><img src="http://widget-30.slide.com/p4/2594073385382055728/lt_t000_v000_s0un_f00/images/xslide42.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.popandpolitics.com/2008/11/07/now-just-a-keepsake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
