primaries

Limbaugh endorses Hillary?

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

nm_limbaugh_070622_ms.jpg

What do Sanjaya Malakar and Hillary Clinton have in common? More than an astounding penchant for sounding shrill and one-note, apparently.

With the news Monday that Rush Limbaugh is telling his Texas listeners to take advantage of the open primary rules in their state by voting for Hillary, he has essentially taken on the Howard Stern role in keeping the vocally-challenged teenager alive on American Idol.

While Stern presumably sought to undermine the legitimacy of the Idol phenomenon, Limbaugh hopes to slow that of Barack Obama and give the Republican party the perceived advantage gained from a drawn-out summer slugfest on the Democratic side.

“I think we all agree that if Sen. Obama wins Texas and Ohio, it’s over,” said David Hardt, Dallas resident and DNC superdelegate, agreeing that if the nomination process lasts through to the convention, it will “tear our party apart.”

“There’s sort of a rush to finish this,” said Sue Lovell, Houston resident and fellow superdelegate to Hardt, emphasizing that no party members she has spoken with “want it to come down to where a smaller group of people cast their vote” and decide the outcome so late in the game.

(more…)

That swing (vote)

Sunday, February 3rd, 2008

polling-station.jpg

If you’re a registered independent in California, leaning left in this 2008 Presidential election, but feeling left out of the super-hyped Super Tuesday festivities, this post is for you. Come to the polls Tuesday because… you can vote! In 2004, Democrats changed the rules to allow independents to participate in their party’s presidential primary. That’s good news for the state’s fastest growing group of registered voters. Independents get to partake in the Clinton/Obama rumble. (But you can’t weigh in on McCain/Romney/Huckabee because the Republican party allows only their own party to vote for their candidates.)

Of course, this leaves a lot of us playing the guessing game because no one really knows which Democratic candidate you independents will support. But with the political scene charged up to an intensity I’ve never witnessed before in my short politically active life, enjoy being courted to no end.

This is how to play. First, make sure you are registered as an independent. In other words, if you checked “decline to state” on your registration form, you’re good to go— you’re officially an independent. Next, when you get to the polling station, you have to ASK for a Democratic ballot. Fail to do this and you’re automatically handed a nonpartisan ballot. Now here’s the hard part: choose the best candidate. That’s it. Make history, you independent, you.

Not so much NH

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008

mccainnh.pnghillnh.png

Hillary won in NH. So that’s what it is. The significant thing is that the youth vote was again a major factor. According to CIRCLE, the youth turnout rate more than doubled since 2004, rising to 43 percent compared to 18 percent in 2004 and 28 percent in 2000. More than that, among Democrats, 18- to 29-year-olds came out in greater percentages than older sets of voters, constituting a major voting bloc. According to CNN, 18- to 29-year-olds made up 18 percent of N.H. primary voters, 30- to 39-year-olds made up 15 percent and 65 and older voters made up 13 percent.

How did Hillary beat back the Obama momentum? Jane Fleming Kleeb, executive director of the Young Voter PAC, wrote a compelling press release, saying “Clinton came out of Iowa knowing she needed to target young people and ran an aggressive campaign among non-college youth.”

“Non-college youth”… They apparently came out for Hill and the college kids for Obama. Pop and Politics wants to know: How exactly did she target non-college youth? Why did she come to think non-college kids would support her over Obama? And if all of this is true, why did they? More on all that later, we hope.

Meantime McCain won, which seems a little like another vote for change on the Republican side, a “stop the madness” of the Bush years kind of vote, a back to honor and genuine military leadership and nontorture and anti-illegal detention and generally what we might now call “Constitutionalism,” or simply a semi-willingness to abide by the Law of the Land.

But Romney got second-most votes, again. He’s been second to two different candidates, which sort of makes him the unloved frontrunner, sort of, doesn’t it?

Last, with her win, the press has all kinds of reasons to publish hideous images of Hillary, which she supplies in abundance. Which, among other things, means young people have been seeing bad photos of Hillary Clinton for sixteen years, ie, for most of their waking lives. Which is partly why (the regular seeing of her not the regular seeing of hideous images of her) Hillary seems such an unlikely genuine change candidate. To get ahead at last of the tragic Bush years, it seems merely impulse to have to get ahead of the Clintons and all their baggage as well.

Update after the jump. (more…)

New Hampshire notes

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

KEENE, N.H. (Main Street, Coffee Shops, My Car)— What follows are some very rough notes from Granite State Primary Day. Sate slogan: “Live Free or Die!” Do the Republicans know that, I wonder. Does Mitt “the most basic civil liberty is the right to be kept alive” Romney know that?

hillnh01.jpg

2:00pm
I park my car on Main Street and am immediately swarmed by a group of rabid politicos. No, not volunteers from one of the campaigns nor from one of the get-out-the-vote local precinct groups. It’s a group of tweens from Keene Middle School conducting an experiment in civics or something, trying to find out why people choose to support one candidate over another.

Sample questions being hurled at me include: “What amazes you about a person?” “Who would you vote for if your favorite candidate wasn’t running?” “Who do you like least?” and of course “Who are you voting for?”

(more…)

Coolness and candor in New Hampshire

Monday, January 7th, 2008

change1nh.jpg

KEENE, N.H.— “Change” has trumped all of the other 2008 campaign buzz-words— words like “experience” “trust” “reliability.” It has come to dominate the rhetoric on the campaign trail and conversations across party lines. It was “change” that catapulted Obama to victory in Iowa, pushed Edwards into a second-place finish and edged its way into Hillary’s carefully crafted pitch, morphing her message of tested leadership into a warning that it takes experience to effect change. Obama is the Democratic candidate that looks and speaks most like change and as a result has so far attracted the most supporters among young voters.

It’s no surprise that Gen-Y has embraced change as a hyper political mantra, and not just out of dissatisfaction with the Bush years. We’re always on, hooked-up and on hyper-drive, constantly surfing, texting and Facebook-messaging our way toward the next big thing— the latest technology, theory, fashion, music, art, YouTube post, drunken celebrity sighting, etc. We’re interested in change in a sped-up way, taking the avant-garde industrial-era impulse to digital extremes, acting inevitably on the consumerist marketing indoctrination we’ve endured as a culture for decades. Out with the old and in with the new. We are not the victims of a societal or generational Attention Deficit Disorder— or maybe we are. Mostly we’re just impatient. And the thing we want to know now is what kind of change are we talking about here, in New Hampshire, the day before the primary election of 2008? What are the actual differences in the changes the candidates are proposing and what are the differences in the perceptions of those proposed changes? What makes one politico’s vision of change cooler than another’s?

(more…)