right wing response

Right Wing Response: Et tu, Auto?

Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

Let’s not bail out the auto industry, too, writes Rich Lowry of National Review. Giants like GM and Ford have long mismanaged their empires, and the argument that the country can’t afford to lose 100,000 jobs casts Detroit automakers as job and welfare programs, he writes. Bailing them out would put us on track for a new wave of protectionism from free-market competition. And President-elect Obama has signaled he may be willing to do it.

On economic policy, Barack Obama’s not really about change. So holds Jonathan Weil at Bloomberg. The president-elect chose 17 people last week for his transition economic advisory board, and many of them ought not to be guiding his decisions on financial matters because they’ve got shady pasts of their own. One of them, former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, was chairman of Citigroup’s executive committee when the bank “helped Enron Corp. cook its books.” There’s more.

Should the courts defer to the popular vote on Prop 8? Jeffrey Rosen and Richard Just, respectively the legal affairs editor and managing editor at The New Republic, have an on-going debate on the issue. The first two parts are here and here. In the third part, Rosen argues that when the Supreme Court’s constitutional authority over an issue is uncertain, as he says they are in the case of abortion and gay marriage, then it should defer to the people and to the Legislature. It’s a high-minded debate.

A black man is president; America no longer needs racial quotas, writes Ken Blackwell in National Review. Racial preference programs harm minorities, anyway, he writes. For example, a 20-percent minimum requirement for minority attendance at a school quickly becomes a 20-percent maximum in practice. Barack Obama has championed change and put forward a vision of a post-racial America, and that’s something everyone should celebrate.

What-next fest continues. David Brooks at the New York Times sees two camps in the struggle for philosophical control over the Republican Party: the Traditionalists, who want to cut taxes, cut big government, and restrict immigration; and the Reformers, who want to address inequality and middle-class economic worries and who tend to see global warming as a more serious issue. His prediction? The Traditionalists will win the near-term battle, but the outcome of the war is uncertain. Over at National Review, Deroy Murdock’s mantra: “What would Reagan do?”

What about Sarah Palin? She appeared in an interview with Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren yesterday, covering everything from the clothes fiasco to why she feels the McCain-Palin ticket lost. Part one is below. Part two is here.

Right Wing Response: Anti-anti-communists pull ahead

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

Michael Ramirez cartoon
Michael Ramirez political cartoon posted on Jewish World Review

Mainstream media are pulling punches against Obama and the Democrats, Richard A. Viguerie writes at Newsmax.com. They have reported the outrage and vitriol of Republican politicians and rally-goers, but downplay the bad behavior of Democrats. And they are minimizing stories about Obama’s more suspicious associations: convicted felon Tony Rezko, who was a major financial supporter early on; and ACORN, an organization being investigated for voter fraud.

Why are they pulling punches? Because the left hates anti-communists even more than they like communists, writes Paul Kengor, a professor of politics at Grove City College in Pennsylvania who has researched and written about the history of communism in America. Perhaps because of memories of McCarthyist witch hunts or because of how public schools teach the history of communism, Americans have strong reactions to anti-communist sentiments. So “when they hear that Barack Obama has deep roots with communist radicals like Bill Ayers and Frank Marshall Davis, (they) don’t care; they don’t get it,” he writes. For Kengor, that means conservatives are in for frustrating days ahead.

In fact, we could be witnessing the end of conservatism altogether, according to Mona Charen. The doom-speak isn’t constrained to those who hate or fear the Bush regime, apparently. Charen writes that an Obama victory and a Democratic super-majority in Congress could invite threats to First Amendment free speech rights and, indeed, a full-blown depression. And since liberal reforms are never undone, we’re looking at a permanent drift from conservatism.

Hugh Hewitt—three questions for Obama I’d like to hear at tonight’s debate: will you support U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald’s investigation into Illinois politics (which has already led to the conviction of pal Tony Rezko), will you continue funding the national missile defense shield at current levels or higher, and will you keep the current funding levels for the Department of Defense with special appropriations for Iraq?

Paul Krugman is dead (career-wise), at least if you agree with Donald Luskin. Krugman was recently awarded the Nobel Prize for economics, but Luskin argues he hasn’t been a real economist in a decade. His columns for The New York Times are leftist rants written far below the talent and eloquence he once displayed, which Luskin compares to Nobel prize-winning astronomers doing a column on astrology.

Right Wing Response: A Weekly Roundup

Wednesday, October 8th, 2008

Was the Palin pic too realistic? Newsweek is catching flak for not retouching a cover photo of the Alaska governor and Republican V.P. candidate because they have supposedly gone out of their way to make Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama look good. Apparently (and you have to see the magazine in person to notice) Palin’s showing too many wrinkles, pores and facial hairs.

McCain got mixed reviews from right-wing bloggers after last night’s debate. Conservative blogger John Hawkins surveyed the responses and came up with three general categories: those who thought McCain barely won, those who thought the debate was dull and did nothing to help McCain, and those who were mortified by McCain’s housing bailout.

Community organizers with ties to Obama may sound more like racketeers to some. Following the raid upon the Las Vegas headquarters of the Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now (ACORN) on suspicion of voter fraud (allegedly registering the Dallas Cowboys’ starting lineup), Modern Conservative blogger Brad O’Leary wrote a piece digging into the organization’s shady history and its ties to presidential candidate Barack Obama. Here’s an organization, he writes, “that was beyond knee-deep in the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac failures which have riveted our economy.” Socialism is still the great evil.

But don’t overreact! A guy in England claims he was shot simply for wearing an Obama T-shirt. I had to include this. It’s a reminder that politics are just the rules we create to ensure our disputes get settled peacefully (if loudly). Ignore the law and violence becomes legislator.

Right Wing Response: Weekly Roundup

Wednesday, October 1st, 2008

Though we tend to skew left at Pop and Politics, there’s a whole other world out there that’s reporting the issues quite differently. We’d like to take a look at them every week.

Ann Coulter apparently saw something creepy in a grassroots video supporting Obama—she followed a link to that video with another one to a Nazi-power song from the 1972 film Cabaret. Children may or may not have political opinions of their own, but come on. I admit I felt a little uneasy watching the kids sing, but then, I feel that way around anything ceremonial. What’s scarier perhaps is that most of the 54 comments on the “Sing for Obama” video were marked as spam (and not just the critics’). The Nazi song is below. For added creepiness, start them playing at exactly the same time and listen. You have to try it. They sync well, trust me.

Sarah Palin has at least three accomplishments to her name as governor of Alaska, according to guest blogger Bill Dyer, writing on radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt’s Townhall.com blog. He blasts the “old media dinosaurs” for not asking her the right questions. Dyer says Palin has used her line-item veto to cut spending from the state budget; renegotiated with full transparency the state’s severance tax on oil and gas production, giving part of the surplus money back to taxpayers; and helped end a stalemate over a $40 billion natural gas pipeline that will lower Alaskans’ high fuel costs and deliver gas to the rest of the country. On this last point, he says, “Gov. Palin has done more to advance the cause of American energy independence than any other politician—of any party, and at any level of state or federal government—in this century.” Quite a claim.

Thank the Democrats for the Wall Street Crisis, say the editors at National Review. An “anything goes” mentality let institutions like Fannie and Freddie get out of control with their debt and spending. That may sound like a joke coming from the free-market camp, but the main contention is that the government overfed the pseudo-public-private lenders with subsidies unavailable to other banks and institutions and then failed to keep an eye on them as they outgrew and brought down the house. And prominent Dems such as John Kerry and Barack Obama were recipients of Fannie-Freddie lobbying and campaign contributions. I like what Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said in September as the financial mess was spiraling out of control—essentially, solutions first, blame later.