romney

Wednesday @ The RNC: Gloves Off, Claws Out

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

I once read that Arnold Schwarzenegger said he picked the Republican party over the Democratic party because they are winners. This was one of those nights when you were reminded why they often win. After a non-start to the Republican National Convention on Monday, and last night’s sometimes effective, but mostly lukewarm speeches from the odd couple, Joe Lieberman and Fred Thompson, tonight the speakers came out with the gloves off.

Think about how many times the Dems told Americans in Denver that John McCain was a good soldier, a good man, they liked him very much, but he’s wrong. And think about how many times they said his name. Hillary even had a slogan with it, “No way, no how, no McCain.”

But the Republican speakers tonight, which included former presidential candidates Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, as well as VP candidate Gov. Sarah Palin, didn’t even say the words, “Barack Obama,” once. He was relegated to “my opponent,” and the audience was told that he’s done “nothing,” “zero,” repeatedly.

Mike Huckabee was the only one to actually give the Illinois senator any credit at all. He praised his candidacy for being historic. “I have great respect for Senator Obama’s achievement not because of his color but the indifference to it. As Americans we celebrate this milestone. It elevates us,” he said, but warned: “The Presidency is not a symbolic job.”

Many of the attack themes that Sen. Hillary Clinton raised during the Democratic primary reared their heads. We haven’t heard about Obama’s non-voting record in a while, but Giuliani made sure that was a sticking point.  He said:

130 times couldn’t make a decision! He couldn’t vote yes or no! It was too tough! He voted Present.

For a President, it’s not good enough to be present. You have to make a decision.

Giuliani’s speech—the whole thing—was as masterful as Bill Clinton’s speech in Denver.

He was at ease, as comfortable as a stand-up comic in the zone, as he delivered little Republican nuggets to his blood-thirsty audience. “He’s the least experienced candidate for President in at least 100 years. It’s not a personal attack—it’s a statement of fact,” he said of Obama, seemingly softening the blow, but then…not: “Barack Obama has never lead anything! Nothing! Nada!”

Line after line, Giuliani went for the kill, he got laughs and applause. But more importantly, his speech specifically went for Obama’s jugular.

All other speakers were lockstep with the marching orders as well. They made fun of Obama’s experience as a community organizer, a job the Democrats have cast as noble and worthwhile, something he chose instead of Wall Street riches, proof that he really cares about people. The RNC crowd literally snickered in the midst of Giuliani’s semi-serious hypothetical match-up between two men for a job that you have to hire. And when he said, “community organizer,” the crowd giggled so much that he had to pause.

(more…)

Adios governor

Friday, February 8th, 2008

To the great dismay of Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh, Mitt Romney made his grand exit from the national stage yesterday, bowing out of the presidential campaign no less the fear monger than when he entered. His uplifting clear-sighted parting words? “Staying in the race would make it easier for [the Democratic party candidate] to win… And frankly, in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding the surrender to terror.” The end of his candidacy is of course a sure sign that the plan formulated by the millions of Democratic voters in this country to surrender to the terrorists is working! What exactly was the “change” he was pushing, again? Oh yeah, it was getting Washington working again by spending more money we don’t have on a border fence to keep out the cheap labor our economic leaders depend upon and by fomenting even greater domestic political division for years to come. As the “terrorists” who have already infiltrated our country might put it: “Adios, señor!”

Hell no in South Carolina

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008

Poor stiff ultra-white Mitt Romney did not say “who let the dogs out” at the beginning of this clip. Someone please say it’s a hoax. And let’s hope he didn’t really say that the infant at the end of the clip is wearing “bling bling.” No, god, he did not.

A final note from the Oh God No! file: Does the Billary team really think it will win votes by accusing Obama of being an (egad!) Reagan Lover? We have to ask: Can the country really elect someone president who either can not discern or is unwilling to admit the difference between (1) saying Reagan was a transformative politician and (2) praising the Reagan presidency and advocating for a return to Reaganomics? Isn’t that the kind of willfully dense president we already have in office?

Ooh gotcha. You said something that sounded positive about a Republican. Hell no. After sixteen years, does the country really need any more of that “experience”?

Old slumpy part II

Tuesday, January 15th, 2008

It’s Michigan day, where Hillary is running pretty much alone for no delegates on the Democrat side. Why would she do that?

On the Republican side, Huckabee and McCain, the frontrunners (!?), are competing for votes from Americans who have been screwed hard and repeatedly by pro-corporate policy, including free trade generally and water privatization in particular, a move that has “increased efficiency” there by essentially turning over Lake Michigan to the private sector, forcing people to get up out of their dwellings and walk like villagers do all over the world to go and collect water somewhere and cart it home to drink and cook and clean and wash themselves. Comically, the new Mitt Romney “change candidate” is running for the benefit of these people against the old Mitt Romney “mad successful corporate job slasher.” This last contest, Romney versus Romney, is the one worth watching.

One voter interviewed on CNN this morning says Michigan “needs a businessman in office” to help it out of its slump. This voter plans maybe to vote for Romney—as if President Romney is going to make it a priority to bring jobs back to Michigan! Please. If America is to be viewed as a business, then Michigan is the part of the business that isn’t working. My guess would be that a President Businessman Romney would run the numbers and make the tough decision to “close” whatever is left of “plant Michigan,” outsourcing the little left that hasn’t already been outsourced, like the Michigan population, for instance, which might profitably be transferred en masse to Mexico, where it could work for America from south of the border, in the sun and for a “good” wage.

In any case, the endorsement that matters most in Michigan went last week to Obama, or as indie-rock Detroit blogger Jasper put it: “to that Borat guy who just got elected president in Iowa or something.” The endorsement comes from the torrent Pirate Party, a champion of Net Neutrality working to speed the evolution of digital-information distribution away from entertainment-industry control. So, you heard it here first: Obama wins Michigan. Stay tuned for the story of Nevada, as the thrilling saga of the horse race for president continues and the Democrats vow to stop the poisonous race baiting threatening to Balkanize their supporters.

Above YouTube: a video for the candidates from what’s left of Detroit.

The “change” candidates

Monday, January 7th, 2008

In New Hampshire, the days before primary voters head to the polls, all the candidates are looking to ride the wave of Iowa-generated Obama Momentum by talking about change, a mostly laughable word in the mouths of U.S. politicians on any day and ironically hilarious in the case of Mitt Romney, a sudden “change” candidate who is also a rich white businessman who can’t be pressed to voice even one significant disagreement with the present extraordinarily unpopular administration. The only change Mitt wants is himself in the White House! If change is what the voters want, Ron Paul and maybe Mike Gravel would be the frontrunners. Granted, there’s not a lot of energy or persuasive power in Gravel to make change, but the snippet above suggests he’s serious at least.

Change? C’mon, Mitt, whaddya say? Should we legalize pot and decriminalize cocaine? Give gay people the same rights as everyone else? Should we revamp the tax code? Reign in our military spending? Provide universal healthcare? Pour resources into public education? Stop the war(s)? Close down Gitmo? Hold the telecoms responsible for allowing government eavesdropping? Appoint a special prosecutor to look into the unabashedly illegal destruction of those CIA torture tapes? Convert to a national green energy policy?

Did he say change? Forget that. “Vote for me, Mitt Romney. And the hell with change!”