southwest

The Green Report: Drought Conditions Worsen Southwest Water Crisis

Friday, March 13th, 2009

As if the fight over water from the Colorado River and Lake Mead could get any worse in the Southwest, the area is facing extreme drought conditions. A recent USA Today article reports that January and February 2009 are the driest beginning of any year since America started keeping precipitation records over a century ago. These low water levels are causing severe droughts in Texas and California, which exacerbates the water crisis in the Southwest.

usa-today-drought-map-320

The map reflects the exceptional (brown-red), extreme (orange) and severe (dark yellow) water problems in California, Nevada and Texas.

usa-today-precipitation-map320

Richard Heim, a meteorologist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center told USA Today that the 2.69-inch average rainfall across the U.S. in January and February is the least amount of moisture in those months since NOAA began keeping records in 1895.

usa-today-drought-record

The current dry spell started in Central Texas in 2007, and hit California along with the rest of the Southwest in 2006. Los Angeles only received 3 inches of rain during 2006-2007, its driest year on record.

As a result of these prolonged drought conditions in California, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger issued a drought emergency in February 2009.  For the first time in 15 years, Los Angeles is planning to implement a water rationing system – achieved “through price-enforced household conservation and tough new lawn watering restrictions.”

“The level of severity of this drought is something we haven’t seen since the early 1970s,” Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said in unveiling his city’s drought plan, which also would put more water cops on the beat.

And to save endangered fish populations, the courts are reducing the amount of water taken from rivers (Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta water source in Northern California). Water officials also decided to cut their Sierra Mountains water source pumped to cities and irrigation districts by 85 percent according to Reuters. These measures highlights the growing tensions between farms/agricultural water uses and animals as well farms/agricultural versus urban/metropolitan water needs.

Thus, another major loser in the water fight are farmers and ranchers.

California farmers lost more than $300 million in 2008 and economic losses may accelerate to 10 times that this year as 95,000 people lose their jobs. Farmers will get zero water from the main federal supplier (Reuters).

As farms continue to suffer, major Southwest cities like Los Angeles, Las Vegas and Phoenix are growing in population. People are moving to the warm sunbelt.

“For the last few years, the driest states, Arizona, Utah, and Nevada, have been the fastest growing. And you know that can’t be sustained,” said James Powell to Reuters.  Powell is the author of “Dead Pool,” a book about global warming and water in the U.S. West.

It’s not surprising that California, the world’s eighth-largest economy, uses enough water to cover the state of Washington in a foot of water.  And approximately 80 percent of the water is used by farms growing crops like organic lettuce and rice. The drought induced water cutback to the farms will cause a dramatic decrease in California’s agricultural production —- which has serious economic implications as well as food supply ramifications.

And to make matters even worse, the droughts are making California more vulnerable to wildfires.  Last year, a record 500,000 Southern Californians had to vacate their homes because of fires.

State officials are using prison inmate crews to clear away brush and create fire breaks around communities to reduce the risk of wildfires, said Daniel Berlant, spokesman for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (USA Today).

A water shortage, drought conditions, fewer crops and the potential for fires is a red flag for an impending disaster.

Life in L.A.: The Fire This Time

Monday, November 17th, 2008

I couldn’t stay away from the window the other night. The gold full moon was so ethereal, so bizarre, it reminded me of the kind of moon you read about in fairy tales.

Yesterday, the sun looked like a giant grapefruit. By dusk, it had added that coral-orange shade to a sky so colorful it resembled the contents of one of the bottles you see filled with different levels of sand…the rainbow kind available in curio shops all over the southwest. Right, those.

At first, I didn’t think these sights had anything to do with one another. Then I smelled the air and read the paper.

It was happening again.

Every fall, the Santa Ana winds bring with them an uncomfortable heat—inducing an Indian summer that nips at days getting dark by four p.m., while the rest of the country prepares for Thanksgiving and Christmas wearing scarves and heavy coats.

Every September and October, or October and November, fires follow the winds, searing through the dryer parts of California.

The mountains and hills, and the valley in between them have gorse, brush and weeds parched enough to ignite when aided by even the tiniest spark.

Whether by a stray gust or arson, that spark inevitably appears.

And every year around this time, hundred, if not thousands, of people lose their homes—some their lives—to the explosive fires borne from those winds.

It breaks my heart. The flames consume these peoples’ personal spaces, the proof of their memories and everything they own.

The LA County air looks and smells so smoky it’s almost as if there were a giant city-wide BBQ . Like the weird light peaking behind forbidden doors in Little Nemo or Harry Potter films, the day seems to have adopted a sickly yellow tinge.

The Los Angeles Times dedicated most of its Sunday edition front page to these fires. The print headline read “Driven by Wind, Catastrophe Sweeps Across Three Counties.” Through its gallery, the online version presents an array of photos depicting still shots of the brilliant red, orange hues of flames devouring everything in their path.

If this, like the mudslides that will certainly come after the rains that will certainly follow these fires, is a predictable disaster, why is it still legal to build houses in those areas? Or, short of that, why is constructing homes with ultra flammable material still so common? While people are not to blame for wanting their houses to look a certain way, the developers, could stand to quell their greed or at least tap into some hindsight by noticing that houses using stucco and tile are more resistant to flame, and since fire comes every year, exposing people (those living there, those fighting the fires and those covering them for news outlets) to needless tragedy and danger is inexcusable.