violence

“Watchmen”: It’s A Smiley Face Turned Upside-Down!

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

smile

It’s really bad when the state of humanity hinges on a bunch of pseudo-sadomasochists parading around as costumed heroes who haphazardly decide to save the world for mere kicks and giggles. This is the twisted sense of humor and entire point of the mystery adventure Watchman.

This 2009 American superhero film is based on DC Comics’ award-winning, limited series graphic novel (1986-1987) illustrated by Dave Gibbons. Zack Snyder, who is famous for the adaptation of the 300 graphic novel, directed the movie. And Lawrence Gordon (Die Hard), Lloyd Levin (United 93) and Deborah Snyder (300) had a hand in producing it.  However, viewers should not expect the same level of cinematic beauty or the type of compelling storytelling in Watchmen that Snyder showed us was possible in 300. Instead, the long and needlessly drawn out film, which lasts a restless two hours and 43 minutes, has the audience wishing for their own superhero powers to teleport themselves out of the theater.

Watchmen begins in the year of 1985, and tells the tale of a group of former vigilantes who used to dress up as superheroes. Although the somewhat-counterfeit crime fighters have “retired,” a couple of them decide to pay attention to the nuclear threat (read: end of world scenario) and tension between the United States and Russia.

The stakes are high but the audience’s investment in the protagonists or their success is relatively low. This weak story drags on for a full hour and forty minutes and consists of confession after confession from weary and depressed individuals who must decide if they are really going to solve the weak mystery, which is somehow connected to the complete obliteration of mankind (for the remaining hour).

And here is where this artificial set of superheroes is exposed. Aren’t most superheroes like Superman concerned with unnecessary violence and killing people? Don’t most champions of justice risk their lives to save others and humanity? And don’t all superheroes have a special power or two that us mere mortals could only dream of?

On these accounts, viewers could legitimately question whether the movie had any bonafide superheroes at all. The protagonists, with the exception of the neon blue Dr. Manhattan, actually lacked any “real” or perceived super powers. Manhattan (Billy Crudup) can see into the future and teleport himself all over the universe after a science lab mistake. Next to him, the other hero hopefuls are pretty laughable. Heck, all they want to do is fight for fun and stave off boredom.

And speaking of characters, there were only a few that are truly memorable. There is the demented and bloodthirsty Rorschach (Jackie Earle Haley), whose street name was Walter Kovacs. Although his journal accounts provide the framework for the story, the inkblot masked Rorschach’s killing scenes will make the audience wonder if the film was written or produced by Quentin Tarantino.

And then there’s Laurie Jupiter (Malin Akerman), whose action hero’s name is Silk Spectre II. She had only one power—her drop dead gorgeous looks that captured the attention of her fellow superheroes. Other than a decent left hook and a swift kick, she disappointed the audience who expected a more Wonder Woman-like performance due to their close resemblance achieved through casting, makeup and wardrobe.

The rest of the major quasi-vigilantes—The Comedian (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) known for his “Life is a joke” attitude, peace at all deadly costs Oxymandias (Matthew Goode), and pushover turned wannabe Superman, Nite Owl II (Patrick Wilson)—leave the role of hero as a lot to be desired.

And for the parents and children expecting a Batman or Spiderman type film, please be aware—this movie is not for anyone under seventeen. In addition to the constant nudity of Dr. Manhattan, there are gratuitous sex scenes that weren’t worth actress Malin Akerman even baring her breast. And more importantly, the violence depicted in scene after scene was extremely bloody, gross and overdone—enough to make a grown man cover his eyes.

And as you may have guessed, the movie begins and ends with violence and death depicted in a realistic manner unlike its comic book beginnings. This is a film that could easily create nightmares for children and adults alike.

Thus, the only characteristic Watchmen smiley face this movie deserves is one that is turned completely upside-down and covered with the blood of its own fake super heroes. Like the main theme of the Watchmen: “Life’s a joke,” clearly this movie was too.

prison to classroom

Sunday, January 28th, 2007

gangsigns

I met two gang intervention specialists last week who work in Harbor City, Harbor Gateway and East Side Torrance in South LA. They are both former gang members and both fathers.

Leroy Martinez is now 52; he was an active gang member until eight years ago. He said he decided to get out because he was “physically and mentally tired of the gangs and the drugs.” He had used drugs for 38 years and “came from five generations of alcoholism, drug use and gang banging.” He said he was thrown out of the house at age 13 and has been living on the streets since—except for his years behind bars, of course. Leroy still has all of his tattoos, covering his arms and riding up to his neck. He said he hasn’t had them removed because they’re a part of him, each one a memory.

Leroy still has a gang injunction against him—technically, he is not allowed to associate with gang members in the very area in which he acts as a gang intervention counselor for LA Bridges II. He said he could get the injunction removed, but it would cost thousands of dollars in legal fees.

Leroy’s step-son was also involved in gangs; he died when he was 22. Leroy said there was a drive-by shooting, and his step-son lay down on the ground uninjured. But then the shooter jumped out of the car and shot at the kid again, this time killing him. Leroy now helps take care of his step-son’s child, an 8-year-old boy.

The other gang counselor, Levi Wade, told me about his son too. He hasn’t seen him in 13 years. He said his son, who was 17 at the time, was in the backseat during a drive-by. He said his son didn’t fire the gun, but he admitted to being in the car and got 15 years in prison for gang affiliation. Levi said it was his son’s first offense. He was able to visit him in prison once, but he has been denied visitation ever since because of his own past. Levi too was an active gang member, in and out of prison.

Now the two men—one Latino, one African American—work together to get kids out of gangs. They refer to each other as “my partner,” and say their bond is as close as family. They work together all day and night, rarely getting a day off and often being called in the middle of the night to respond to the scene of a shooting. They show up and first try to control the rumors. Communication is key, both men said. A lot of problems result from misunderstandings. They talk to as many people as they can, figure out who did what and why, and then they mediate the situation.

They don’t carry weapons or wear bulletproof vests, and they never get paid overtime. They say they make less money than the janitors or secretaries. They wouldn’t tell me how much they make because they said it is shameful. Nonetheless, they kept telling me they love their work and wouldn’t change it for anything.

When they’re not out on the streets, they’re in the classroom, telling kids why they should study and get a degree. They size the kids up and tell them they don’t have what it takes to be a gang member. They tell them they’re not going to survive being a gangster—they’re not strong enough. One time they put a kid in the front of the room, bent him over a desk and told him that’s what will happen to him in prison. The kid changed his behavior, they said.

What happens when they find a kid who they think is tough enough to survive as a gangster? Levi tells him: “I ain’t wasting my time with your punk ass. You better talk to my partner.”

Leroy says he’ll help anybody. “I got a conscience,” he laughs.

They’ve been working together for six years and say their tactics work. They provide the kids the support and attention—as well as food, clothing and legal advice—that they need.

And they think that their personal stories, their past encounters with the law time and again, help them reach today’s young gangsters.

combatting gang violence, again

Thursday, January 18th, 2007

LA City Council

The City of Los Angeles needs a new unified, comprehensive plan to tackle the entrenched culture of gang violence that continues to take hundreds of young lives every year, said top city and county officials and community leaders yesterday. Hundreds of people packed into the Los Angeles City Council Chambers to listen to the findings of the council’s Ad Hoc Committee on Gang Violence and Youth Development.

“Gang members are as violent as ever,” said panelist City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo, citing the recent spike of 14 percent in gang violence in 2006.

The violence not only affects the individual victims but their families and entire communities, said the panelists. Eighty-eight percent of sixth graders have seen multiple instances of violence, according to Los Angeles Unified School District Superintendent David Brewer. “We cannot educate our children under those circumstances,” he said. “If you stabilize the communities, I will educate them.”

The City Council commissioned the Advancement Project to create a citywide gang reduction strategy last year. The report calls the region’s gang homicides and violence an “epidemic.” It offers more than 100 recommendations, including creating the political will to tackle this issue, confronting the size and scope of the problem and addressing the “conditions in neighborhoods and the unmet needs of children that allow gangs to take root, flourish and expand.”

“Children are not born violent,” said Advancement Project Director Connie Rice at the public hearing. “Children become violent because we fail them.”