When Watergate rocked the country thirty-five years ago, at the center of the turmoil, anonymous to everyone but Woodward and Bernstein, the President, and the President’s top aides, was W. Mark Felt, aka Deep Throat.

In 2003, the Nixon tapes were released to the Library of Congress, but it wasn’t until 2005 when Felt’s family announced his identity that America became aware of his role in our nation’s biggest scandal.

Felt passed away this week at the age of 95. Bob Woodward wrote his Washington Post obituary.

In the classic movie All the President’s Men, Woodward, played by Robert Redford, meets Felt, played by John Robard, in a dark alley. Please enjoy:

RIP, Mr. Felt.

Michael Ramirez cartoon for December 2, 2008 at Investor's Business Daily.

Barack Obama may have flip-flopped on Hillary’s foreign policy experience, but that’s small potatoes. Allahpundit, in a post at Hot Air, writes that lying is to be expected from the President-elect, but the more important issue is that he has made ambassador to the U.N. a Cabinet-level position, signaling to Hillary Clinton that she can be replaced, and that Obama means business when he says he wants soft diplomacy to play a bigger role in his administration.

Advice to Obama: don’t repeat the mistakes of Hoover and Roosevelt. Investor’s Business Daily points out this economic downturn is serious but by no means as severe as the Depression, but warns that we still ought to heed past lessons. In a nutshell: support free trade, cut taxes across the board, don’t rely on big government projects as economic stimuli, and support the Fed as it cuts rates.

Piracy is one of those unconventional threats Washington worries about: so get ‘em where it hurts. Seth Cropsey argues on The Weekly Standard’s blog and in an article that arming merchant vessels and increasing Navy patrols may help, but nothing will work quite so well as finding and attacking the pirates on shore (in Somalia), something the Russians have suggested.

Chambliss’ win in Georgia could spell a tough midterm election for Dems in 2010. When Saxby Chambliss beat Jim Martin by 16 points in what was expected to be a very close race, Democrats lost their chance at a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. Ed Morrissey at Hot Air argues that Democratic gains in 2008 don’t mark an endorsement of their policies and warns them against moving any farther to the left. The win also means Senate Dems will be unlikely to step in and decide the outcome in Minnesota, where Al Franken is caught up in a protracted recount effort—not without a chance for 60 in the Senate, argues Gary Gross at Let Freedom Ring.

Gay marriage won’t be all bad, but enough with the scorched-earth tactics, says Jonah Goldberg in an opinion piece for the L.A. Times. Goldberg cites vandalism against Mormon temples, mailing envelopes filled with white powder to Mormons, Mormon blacklists, and points out angrily that the Hollywood liberals who would decry McCarthyism are employing the same methods against proponents of Prop 8.

Don’t compare Bush to Nixon, says Fox News journalist Chris Wallace to film director Ron Howard. Wallace was at a film screening for Howard’s new movie, Frost/Nixon, about the former president who resigned after the Watergate scandal. Wallace argued that Nixon’s crimes were motivated purely by personal political gain, while President George W. Bush’s (referring to rendition and waterboarding) were motivated by a desire to protect his country. So there.

“I believe there is something out there watching us. Unfortunately, it’s the government.”

-Woody Allen

Sixty one years ago this week, The House Un-American Activities Committee began its now well-known Hollywood investigation. The search resulted in nine day hearings and the historic “blacklist” of ten, and later more than 300, Communist sympathizers or perceived Communist sympathizers in the industry. Its “witch hunt”-like nature led Arthur Miller to write The Crucible, a play that uses the Salem witch trials as an allegory for Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s actions.

HUAAC folded in on itself in 1975 (the same year the Vietnam War ended, Franco died and Mitchell, Haldeman and Ehrlichman were found guilty of covering up Watergate…seems like a year for being fed up).

Has the government, however, made “butting out” progress since then?

I guess, being the government, “butting out” isn’t really in its job description. Apart from its “regular” obligations, it’s responsible for checking those things menacing to national, and thus presumably each individual’s personal, security.

Cold War bound McCarthy wanted to eliminate the Communist threat. Bush and Congress passed the USA Patriot Act in 2001 to defend the country against terrorism. The perils both Communism and Terrorism presented to the country at each time were, in a way, legitimate. Turns out the Rosenbergs were spies after all. September 11th really did happen.

But where do we draw the line?

Benjamin Franklin’s quote “Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” pretty much encapsulates the fact that the end doesn’t always justify the means, especially when it encroaches on civil right (one of the reasons The House of Reps called their counter Patriot Act the Benjamin Franklin True Patriot Act, a Kucinich/Paul sponsored document about which I can comment little for or against as I my knowledge extends not far).

Then again, I don’t know. Detectives obtain search warrants to look through private property and personal correspondences all the time. The law permits them the right to do so should they have “reason” to believe that search will yield proof that a felony, for example, has been committed.

So what’s the difference?

Every time I try to figure out where one differs from the other, justify both or neither, I stonewall myself with counterarguments (it’s very tiring).

But as long as dangerous name calling, rife with implication, isn’t dead (and it isn’t), don’t we have to try to figure that out? The House of Representatives has had its own kerfuffles lately. House Republicans have accused House Democrats and such institutions as Columbia University of being “anti-American” for not supporting certain energy obtaining measures.

I don’t want to make this a Republican v. Democrat issue. I hate hearing the “Republicans are evil. Democrats are Saints” litany. It’s tantamount to childishly painting the political arena black and white (where black is “bad,” “white” good) rather than red and blue. I have to say both sides do a disgusting amount of tomato throwing.

The point, though, is that I think our government still breathes down our necks too much for comfort. Frankly, what with the Pellicano, MySpace and Facebook voyeurism feverishly (and often dangerously) making its way to computer screens and phones around the globe, everyone does and perhaps far more than the government really does.

While the whole “McCarthyism” description used as a symbol for American Totalitarianism has gotten pretty stale, and we’re a lot better off than many countries have ever been, we shouldn’t abide by moral relativism. Just because we’re freer by comparison doesn’t mean we’re free enough.

Personally, I’m not a fan of big government. In an ideal world, there wouldn’t be a government at all. We wouldn’t need one. But I think that one thing most people can probably agree on is that we don’t live in an ideal world, and Sir Thomas More’s dreams, or at least what have been retroactively interpreted as those dreams, aren’t likely to come true.

That being the case, let’s not let this 61st anniversary be a deja vu moment.