wikipedia

Breakfast bites: morning news roundup

Thursday, July 31st, 2008

And now…make-up sex: After 140 years of sleeping on the couch in Black America, the House of Representatives has issued a formal apology for “the institution of slavery, and the subsequent Jim Crow laws that for years discriminated against blacks as second-class citizens in American society,” NPR reports.  As the Washington Post points out, though, this comes after apologies were issued to Native and Japanese Americans.  They even drafted a bill to classify the Ottoman Turk cleansing of Armenians during WWI as genocide (it failed).  Not that that any xenophobic or racist act is less severe than another, but say what? It took us this long to get around to making formal amends with the African American community?  ”Such efforts were always bogged down by concerns that the apology would prompt a greater call for reparations for slavery,” says the Post article.  In a word: weaksauce.  We all know that Tron would win it all in a dice game anyways.

That’s hot: The McCain campaign, bolstered by the same, Steve Schmidt-led team that helped G-Dub edge out the ketchup dude in 2004, is launching an all out assault to “define Mr. Obama as arrogant, out of touch and unprepared for the presidency,” according to the New York Times.  This from the 71-year-old who called himself completely computer illiterate.  Apparently the first step is to equate him with Britney Spears and Paris Hilton in the minds of voters with a new TV spot.  The Obama campaign fired back, claiming this isn’t the John McCain that lamented personal attacks and vowed to take the high road.  I say they’re both coming off like a bunch of whiners right now.  Can we get to the debates already?

Nobody’s a hipster: If you thought TMZ.com getting more hits than all of the major newspapers sites combined signaled the end of society as we know it, you were wrong!  It’s actually hipsterdom, that vast cultural black hole, leeching all that is sacred and cool from all past counter-culture movements, according to Douglas Haddow over at AdBusters.  There are too many hyperbolic gems in this piece to relay here, but “the dance floor at a hipster party looks like it should be surrounded by quotation marks” should give you a feel for the tone.  The social constructs of the word “hipster,” and the seeming phobia of the word by all who outwardly identify themselves as one are dissected in the piece.  Last I checked AdBusters was a pretty hipsterish (gasp!) site, though.  Pot?  Kettle?  Chicken?  Egg?  Who cares, it’s a fun read.

(more…)

Breakfast bits: news digest

Friday, July 25th, 2008

The Grassy Knol: Google is flipping the bird to Wikipedia this week by launching their own collaborative web encyclopedia, dubbed “Knol“.  They define a knol as a “unit of knowledge” but the real jab is how they describe individual articles: “an authoritative article about a specific topic.” [emhpasis added]  Rather than opening a topic up for creation and editing by all who please (a la Wikipedia), Knols are created and maintained by individuals who set the level of collaboration (default setting requires creator to approve suggested changes).  Users are encouraged to create a bio to display their credentials.  Google also encourages authors to employ Creative Commons licensing on their work.  By creating a more controlled environment, Google is trying to look like iTunes next to Wiki’s Napster.  How well Knol does will surely be a referendum on Wikipedia’s trustworthyness as a resource.  Knol’s transparency just might kill off the snickers from the fact-checking peanut gallery when someone cites an online encyclopeida as a source.

The Shield: Not the Michael Chiklis cop opera (final season…BRING IT), but a Washington Post article calling for the Senate to follow in the House’s footsteps on passing a shield law for reporters and their confidential sources, at the urging of “the Senate Judiciary Committee…the presumptive Republican and Democratic presidential nominees…the attorneys general[s] of 42 states,” and the already-adopted laws of  “49 states and the District.”  The states offer protection against reporters compelled to reveal confidential sources in criminal investigations, but “the absence of a federal statute undermines those protections, ‘producing inconsistency and uncertainty for reporters and the confidential sources,’ a letter from 41 of the attorneys general noted.”  Wherefore art thou, Scooter and Judith?  Valerie and Dick?  I’m sure you have an opinion here…

(more…)